PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 21, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Value of hyperspectral data for wall to wall wetland vegetation mapping in heterogeneous landscapes

AJAnna JarocińskaDKDominik KopećJNJan Niedzielko

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of hyperspectral data for creating a vegetation map in wetlands for conservation purposes.
  • Acquired hyperspectral, LiDAR, and RGBN data over 325 km2 in Narew National Park.
  • Collected 1,921 reference polygons for model training and validation.
  • Applied the CatBoost machine learning algorithm to classify vegetation under different data scenarios.
  • Achieved overall accuracy of 0.82 using hyperspectral and LiDAR data for vegetation mapping.
  • Reduced classification accuracy by 0.10 when using RGBN data instead of hyperspectral data.
  • Classification accuracy dropped to 0.63 when only LiDAR data was used.

Abstract

Remote sensing is increasingly employed today for the creation of wall-to-wall vegetation maps of protected areas. The main objective of this study was to evaluate whether it is feasible to develop a remote sensing-based wall-to-wall vegetation map of wetlands that is useful for nature conservation purposes without hyperspectral data. The research was conducted in the Narew National Park in north-eastern Poland. In 2020, three types of airborne data covering an area of 325 km2 were acquired: hyperspectral, Light Detection and Ranging data (LiDAR), and from visible and near infrared range (RGBN) imagery. At the same time, botanists collected 1,921 reference polygons for training and validating the machine learning model. Then, classifications were conducted using the CatBoost algorithm with four different scenarios created from the mentioned datasets. The results indicate that, based on hyperspectral and LiDAR data, it is possible to produce a wall-to-wall vegetation map with an overall accuracy of 0.82. When hyperspectral data are replaced by less expensive and widely accessible RGBN data, accuracy declines by 0.10; this reduction decreases to 0.09 if textural features derived from the RGBN data are additionally incorporated into the classification. In scenarios where only LiDAR data are available, vegetation classification accuracy is much lower, reaching 0.63. Comparison of the remote sensing maps with a vegetation map created through field mapping methods indicates that, irrespective of whether hyperspectral or only RGBN and LiDAR data are available, remote sensing maps contribute substantial new knowledge regarding wetland vegetation in spatially heterogeneous landscapes and are highly useful for their conservation management.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jarocińska et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69be34af6e48c4981c672caahttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-44275-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper