PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 21, 2026Cell Reports Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Suboptimal therapeutic responses associated with semaglutide in type 2 diabetes and obesity: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

View Full Paper
DKDonghyun KoDKDo Han KimFTFrankie Tan

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess the proportion of patients with suboptimal responses to semaglutide treatment for obesity and type 2 diabetes.
  • Conducted a meta-analysis of 33 randomized controlled trials.
  • Included 21,023 participants, both with and without type 2 diabetes.
  • Analyzed rates of body weight reduction and treatment discontinuation due to adverse events.
  • 33.4% of participants did not achieve ≥5% body weight reduction.
  • 65.1% did not achieve ≥10% weight loss.
  • Up to 79.8% of individuals with type 2 diabetes did not achieve ≥10% weight loss.

Abstract

Semaglutide has emerged as a leading therapy for metabolic disorders, with robust evidence supporting its role in treating obesity and type 2 diabetes while reducing cardiovascular and renal risks. However, limited data exist on the proportion of patients who have suboptimal therapeutic responses or discontinue treatment due to adverse events. We present an analysis including 33 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comprising 21,023 participants. Across included trials of patients with and without type 2 diabetes, 33.4% and 65.1% of participants did not achieve ≥5% or ≥10% total body weight reduction, respectively. Stratified analyses demonstrated higher rates of suboptimal outcomes among individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), with up to 79.8% not achieving ≥10% weight loss, compared to 30.1% among individuals without T2DM. While semaglutide is effective in many patients, a substantial subset of patients has suboptimal weight or glycemic improvements or discontinues therapy. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251086132).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ko et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69be34af6e48c4981c672dbfhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrm.2026.102614
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1In meta-analyses of proportion studies, funnel plots were found to be an inaccurate method of assessing publication bias2014 · 802 citations
  2. 2Fixed and random effects models: making an informed choice2018 · 1,107 citations
  3. 3Efficacy and safety of once‐weekly semaglutide versus once‐daily sitagliptin as add‐on to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes in SUSTAIN China : A 30‐week, double‐blind, phase 3a, randomized trial2020 · 110 citations
  4. 4Efficacy and safety of once weekly semaglutide 2·4 mg for weight management in a predominantly east Asian population with overweight or obesity (STEP 7): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial2024 · 128 citations
  5. 5Safety and efficacy of once‐weekly semaglutide vs additional oral antidiabetic drugs in Japanese people with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes: A randomized trial2018 · 131 citations