PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 21, 2026Endoscopic Ultrasound0 citations

Comparison of postprocedural adverse events between same-day and separate-day combined EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with pancreatic mass and biliary obstruction: A retrospective cohort study

View Full Paper
HZHong-yuan ZouZLZheng-Dong LiJZJia-Hui Zhu

Key Points

  • This research aims to determine the safety and efficacy of same-day versus separate-day EUS-FNA/B and ERCP procedures in patients with pancreatic mass and biliary obstruction.
  • Conducted a retrospective analysis of 362 patients at Changhai Hospital.
  • Divided patients into same-day and separate-day procedure groups.
  • Assessed adverse events, biliary stenting success, and diagnostic yield.
  • Used logistic regression to identify risk factors for adverse events.
  • No perforations occurred in either group.
  • Rates of pancreatitis, infection, and bleeding were similar between groups.
  • Technical success rates of biliary stenting and diagnostic yield showed no differences.
  • Same-day procedures led to shorter median hospital stays (6 days vs. 7 days, P = 0.002).
  • Certain factors like age and mass size decreased pancreatitis risk, while overweight status increased it.

Abstract

Background and Objective: The optimal timing between endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy (EUS-FNA/B) remains undefined. This study compared The optimal timing between endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy (EUS-FNA/B) remains undefined. This study compared the safety and efficacy of same-day versus separate-day procedures.the safety and efficacy of same-day versus separate-day procedures. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 362 patients with pancreatic mass and biliary obstruction who underwent EUS-FNA/B and ERCP during one hospitalization period at Changhai Hospital between January 2017 and February 2024. Outcomes included adverse events, technical success of biliary stenting, and diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA/B. Logistic regression identified risk factors for adverse events. Results: Patients were stratified into same-day (group A, n = 60) and separate-day (group B, n = 302) groups. No perforations occurred in either group. Rates of pancreatitis (10.0% vs. 9.3%), infection (10.0% vs. 8.3%), and bleeding (1.7% vs. 3.7%) were comparable (all P > 0.05). Technical success of biliary stenting (96.7% vs. 96.7%) and diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA/B (80.0% vs. 84.8%) showed no intergroup differences. Notably, same-day procedures significantly shortened median hospital stay (6 4–8.75 days vs. 7 6–10 days, P = 0.002). Multivariable analysis identified advancing age (odds ratio OR: 0.957; 95% confidence interval CI, 0.924–0.991; P = 0.014) and larger mass short-axis diameter (OR: 0.918; 95% CI, 0.868–0.971; P = 0.003) as independent protective factors against pancreatitis, while overweight status (body mass index > 23.9 kg/m 2 ) increased pancreatitis risk (OR: 3.491; 95% CI, 1.574–7.744; P = 0.002). Precut sphincterotomy was independently associated with bleeding risk (OR: 1.607; 95% CI, 1.230–20.242; P = 0.024). Crucially, the same-day procedure was not linked to increased adverse events. Conclusion: Same-day ERCP and EUS-FNA/B is safe and feasible, does not increase adverse events, and reduces hospital stay.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zou et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69be35d76e48c4981c6743f4https://doi.org/10.1097/eus.0000000000000174
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper