PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 21, 2026Applied Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

From Simulation to Reality: GAN-Based Transformation of Pavement Defect Images for YOLO Detection

View Full Paper
JYJing YangSYShukai YuYYYuquan Yao

Key Points

  • The study aims to enhance pavement defect detection by using simulated images and machine learning techniques.
  • Simulated pavement defects using GprMax for three-dimensional ground-penetrating radar (3D GPR) analysis.
  • Applied Cycle-Consistent Generative Adversarial Network (Cycle-GAN) for style transfer to bridge the domain gap.
  • Compared four YOLO models using real datasets to determine optimal performance for defect detection.
  • Evaluated the impact of varying synthetic data proportions on detection accuracy.
  • Moderate synthetic data improved loose defect recognition from 76.7% to 78.9%.
  • Negative impact on crack and debonding detection performance.
  • Excessive synthetic data led to overfitting, diminishing the model's generalization.
  • YOLOv7 had the best performance with a mean Average Precision (mAP) of 83.4% and an 88.2% crack detection rate.

Abstract

The application of three-dimensional ground-penetrating radar (3D GPR) for intelligent pavement defect analysis is often constrained by the limited availability of labeled samples. To address this challenge, this study employed Ground Penetrating Radar Maxwell (GprMax) to simulate typical pavement defects, including cracks, loose materials, and interlayer debonding. A Cycle-Consistent Generative Adversarial Network (Cycle-GAN) was then introduced to perform style transfer on the simulated images, thereby reducing the domain gap between simulated and real radar images. Furthermore, four You Only Look Once (YOLO) models—YOLO version 5, YOLOX, YOLO version 7, and YOLO version 8—were systematically compared using real datasets to identify the best-performing model, which was subsequently used to evaluate the effect of different proportions of synthetic data on detection performance. The results demonstrated that the moderate inclusion of synthetic data improved the recognition accuracy of loose defects (from 76.7% to 78.9%), whereas its impact on crack and debonding detection was negative. Moreover, excessive reliance on synthetic data led to overfitting, thereby reducing the model’s generalization capability. Among the four models, YOLOv7 achieved the best overall performance, with a mean Average Precision (mAP) of 83.4% and a crack detection rate of 88.2%. This study thus provides a feasible technical pathway and model selection reference for automated GPR-based pavement defect identification, offering practical value for efficient and accurate road maintenance inspections.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69be36086e48c4981c6749eehttps://doi.org/10.3390/app16062978
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper