PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 21, 2026People and Nature0 citationsOpen Access

Sociodemographic and regional differences in human–coyote interactions and human attitudes towards coyotes

View Full Paper
EZEmily ZepedaENElizabeth Elliot NoeCSChristopher J. Schell

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore how sociodemographic factors and locality affect human attitudes towards coyotes.
  • Conducted an online survey among residents of Cook County, Illinois, and Los Angeles County, California.
  • Evaluated the relationship between sociodemographic characteristics, outdoor activities, and attitudes towards coyotes.
  • Assessed fear and attitudes towards coyotes based on direct experience and county of residence.
  • Female respondents and those with low incomes showed greater fear and less positive attitudes towards coyotes.
  • Responses varied by race, with Asian, Pacific Islander, or Black respondents displaying more fear than White respondents.
  • Low participation in outdoor activities correlated with negative attitudes towards coyotes, particularly in individuals from Cook County.

Abstract

Abstract Attitudes and emotions shape how humans perceive and behave towards wildlife, making them a key component affecting human–wildlife coexistence. In addition to direct experience with wildlife, research shows that sociodemographic characteristics and locality can influence a person's relationship with wildlife through cultural norms, economic factors and general experiences with nature. We focussed on the interaction between humans and coyotes, a widespread North American urban mammal that has had a particularly divisive history of interactions with humans. We used data from an online survey distributed to residents of Cook County (CC), Illinois and Los Angeles County (LAC), California, to evaluate the relationship between county of residence, sociodemographics, outdoor activity participation, direct experience with coyotes and attitudes and fear towards coyotes. Our results indicated that respondents who identified as female, respondents with low incomes, respondents who identify as Asian, Pacific Islander, or Black, and respondents from CC tended to have less positive attitudes and greater fear towards coyotes than male respondents, respondents with high incomes, White respondents, and respondents from LAC. Some groups' perceptions of coyotes were partly explained by their lower participation in outdoor activities (i.e. respondents with low incomes, Asian and Pacific Islander respondents, respondents from CC) and/or their less frequent sightings of coyotes (i.e. female respondents, low‐income respondents, Asian and Pacific Islander respondents). Our study suggests that in addition to direct experiences, or in their absence, societal structures based on class, race and gender influence how people interact with and perceive wildlife. This adds to a growing literature underscoring the significance of understanding how systems of oppression shape human–wildlife interactions and experiences, emphasizing the need to incorporate an environmental justice lens to human‐wildlife coexistence. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zepeda et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69be36416e48c4981c674fbbhttps://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.70274
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper