PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 21, 2026Chemistry - Methods0 citationsOpen Access

Stability of Information‐Carrying DNA Origami Nanostructures During Repeated Freeze–Thaw Cycles

View Full Paper
XLXinyang LiLRLukas RabbeJLJacqueline Linneweber

Key Points

  • The research aims to assess how repeated freeze-thaw cycles affect the integrity of DNA origami nanostructures carrying biotin modifications.
  • Investigated structural integrity of DNA origami nanostructures after freeze-thaw cycles.
  • Compared binding yields of streptavidin in two strategies: SAv-bound and SAv-free DONs.
  • Used atomic force microscopy (AFM) to visualize binding efficiency before and after cycling.
  • DNA origami nanostructures maintained overall shape but showed slight damage after freeze-thaw cycles.
  • SAv binding decreased slightly, indicating reduced functionality post-cycling.
  • Adding glycerol effectively restored SAv binding yields, improving stability.
  • SAv exposure after freeze-thaw yielded higher binding yields with lower nonspecific adsorption than the first strategy.

Abstract

Encoding information in molecular arrangements on DNA origami nanostructures (DONs) provides the basis for novel concepts in molecular data storage and computing. To preserve their integrity over long timescales, the information‐carrying DONs are often stored in a frozen state. Here, we investigate the effect of repeated freeze–thaw (F/T) cycles on the structural and functional integrity of DONs carrying biotin (Bt) modifications. Streptavidin (SAv) binding is used to visualize the stored information by atomic force microscopy (AFM) before and after 40 F/T cycles. Two strategies are compared by F/T cycling of (I) SAv‐bound DONs and (II) SAv‐free DONs that are exposed to SAv directly before AFM imaging. Our results reveal that while the DONs retain their overall shape, F/T cycling induces a small amount of damage, leading to slightly reduced SAv binding. Adding glycerol at mM concentrations efficiently protects the DONs and restores the original SAv binding yields. Nevertheless, SAv exposure after F/T cycling leads to slightly higher and more consistent SAv binding yields and a lower background of nonspecifically adsorbed SAv compared to Strategy I. This makes information readout by AFM more efficient and renders Strategy II more convenient for long‐term storage of information‐carrying DONs with repeated information readout.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69be36e36e48c4981c6762fahttps://doi.org/10.1002/cmtd.202500161
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Vancomycin‐Modified DNA Origami Nanostructures for Targeting Bacterial Pathogens2025 · 3 citations
  2. 2Effect of freezing and thawing rates on denaturation of proteins in aqueous solutions2003 · 391 citations
  3. 3DNA Origami Framework‐Based Spatial Nanochip for Circular ssDNA Assembly and Data Storage2025 · 8 citations
  4. 4Protocols for dry DNA storage and shipment at room temperature2013 · 74 citations
  5. 5Cost-efficient folding of functionalized DNA origami nanostructures via staple recycling2025 · 2 citations