PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 21, 2026Journal of Environmental Quality0 citationsOpen Access

Soil beneficial bacteria: Harnessing tools for optimizing citrus growth and soil health in pH‐stressed soils

View Full Paper
SSShankar ShresthaLWLaura WaldoASArnold W. Schumann

Key Points

  • This research investigates how plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) affect citrus growth and soil health in varying pH levels.
  • Conducted a greenhouse study at the University of Florida
  • Used a 3 × 3 factorial randomized complete block design
  • Evaluated three soil pH levels (5.0, 6.5, 8.0) and three PGPR/fertilizer combinations
  • Optimal growth observed at pH 6.5
  • PGPR improved plant height by 27.84 cm and root mass density by 7.65 mg/cm³
  • Soil organic matter and microbial respiration increased significantly with PGPR by 1.15 and 1.65 folds respectively

Abstract

Rhizosphere bacteria can support crop production by promoting plant health, soil fertility, and resilience to biotic and abiotic stresses. However, the potential role of soil-beneficial bacteria, particularly plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), remains inadequately explored in citrus production grown on pH-stressed soil. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of PGPR on citrus growth and soil health indicators under pH-stressed Florida sandy soil. A greenhouse study was conducted at the University of Florida, Lake Alfred, which followed a 3 × 3 factorial randomized complete block design with three soil pH levels (5.0, 6.5, and 8.0) and three PGPR (P)/fertilizer (F) combinations (P + 75% F, P + 100% F, and 100% F only). Soil pH conditions were adjusted using a soil neutralization curve generated by soil incubation methods. The results showed that the soil pH factor significantly influenced most crop growth parameters, with optimal results at a pH of 6.5. PGPR significantly (p 3), stem diameter (4.89 mm), and aboveground biomass (2.64 g/ plant) compared to without PGPR application. No significant difference between 75% and 100% fertilizer rates were found in crop and soil attributes when PGPR was applied. Soil organic matter and microbial respiration were also significantly improved (p < 0.05) with PGPR inoculation by 1.15 and 1.65 folds, respectively, compared to 100% F-only treatment. The availability of soil nutrients was influenced by PGPR treatments, which likely enhanced nutrient uptake and improved crop growth even with a reduced fertilizer rate. The results suggested that PGPR inoculation combined with partial fertilization can improve soil health indicators and plant growth, even in pH-stressed sandy soils.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shrestha et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69be37626e48c4981c676fcahttps://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.70165
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Enhancing nutrient uptake and grapefruit (Citrus paradisi) growth through soil application of beneficial bacteria (Bacillus spp.)2024 · 7 citations
  2. 2Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation1995 · 254 citations
  3. 3Mehlich 3 soil test extractant: A modification of Mehlich 2 extractant1984 · 5,633 citations
  4. 4Effects of root medium pH on water transport in paper birch (Betula papyrifera) seedlings in relation to root temperature and abscisic acid treatments2004 · 63 citations
  5. 5Genome analysis of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 reveals its potential for biocontrol of plant pathogens2008 · 474 citations