This work presents SENTISEC, a hybrid LLM-based threat detection framework designed to classify security logs by integrating keyword heuristics, domain-adapted sentiment scoring, and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). The system achieves an overall accuracy of 93.67%, with 91.46% macro recall, 89.07% macro F1, and 95.15% threat recall, while maintaining a low false-positive rate of 1.68%. Its methodology incorporates strict keyword and IOC matching, a domain-tuned DistilBERT sentiment module, hybrid BM25–MiniLM retrieval enhanced with BGE reranking, adaptive quantile-based threshold calibration, and SHAP-based explainability. Comparative evaluations against keyword-only, sentiment-only, classical machine-learning models, and DistilBERT-only baselines show that SENTISEC consistently improves both true-positive and true-negative discrimination, particularly in semantically noisy and imbalanced log environments. The primary error pattern—benign logs incorrectly flagged as threats—is effectively reduced through calibrated FP/TN thresholds, contextual co-occurrence filtering, and weighted fusion of rule-based, sentiment-based, and semantic signals. SHAP analysis further indicates that RAG-derived semantic embeddings exert the strongest influence on final threat decisions, complemented by sentiment logits that refine ambiguous cues and rule-based indicators that anchor explicit IOC matches. Through the integration of symbolic evidence and deep semantic reasoning within a transparent calibration and explanation framework, SENTISEC provides an adaptive, interpretable, and operationally practical solution for analyzing system logs in spyware-oriented threat scenarios.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ridho Surya Kusuma
ERUM ASHRAF
SELVAKUMAR MANICKAM
TURKISH JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTER SCIENCES
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kusuma et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69be37726e48c4981c677124 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0632.4169