PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 21, 2026Pulse0 citationsOpen Access

Aortic calcification and pulse wave velocity remain associated after adjustment for kidney function and covariates

View Full Paper
JNJakob NyvadKCKent Lodberg ChristensenGAGratien Andersen

Key Result

Aortic calcification accounts for 30% of the variation in pulse wave velocity, remaining significantly associated across all stages of kidney function even after adjusting for eGFR and covariates.

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore the relationship between aortic calcification and pulse wave velocity, particularly in the context of kidney function.
  • Prospective recruitment of chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients and those with normal kidney function.
  • Non-contrast computed tomography scans for identifying aortic wall calcification via Agatston scoring.
  • Measurement of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) and biochemical marker assessment.
  • A total of 144 patients were included in the analysis, with 110 having chronic kidney disease.
  • Agatston score significantly correlated with cfPWV (p<0.001).
  • Age and diabetes also showed significant associations with cfPWV.
  • Agatston score accounted for 30% of the variation in cfPWV after adjustment for other factors.

Structured PICO

Is aortic wall calcification associated with arterial stiffness (cfPWV) independent of kidney function in patients planned for coronary angiography?

P
Population
Patients planned for invasive coronary angiography, including those with chronic kidney disease (eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2) and normal renal function
I
Intervention
Aortic wall calcification assessment via non-contrast computed tomography (Agatston scoring)
O
Outcome
Association between aortic wall calcification (Agatston score) and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV)surrogate

Aortic calcification is strongly associated with arterial stiffness independent of kidney function, though much of the variation in stiffness remains unexplained by traditional risk factors.

Abstract

Background: Aortic wall calcification increases arterial stiffness which is often assessed by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV). However, the impact of kidney function upon the association between calcification of the aortic wall and cfPWV remains unknown. Methods: To examine the association between aortic calcification and cfPWV, we prospectively recruited CKD patients (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)<60 ml/min/1.73 m2) and patients with normal renal function, planned for invasive coronary angiography. Participants underwent a non-contrast computed tomography scan of the entire aorta with subsequent Agatston scoring of the aortic wall in addition to a standardized cfPWV measurement and biochemical markers. Results: A total of 144 patients (67.1±10.3 years, 24% female), of whom 110 had CKD (26 stage 3a, 33 stage 3b, 24 stage 4 and 27 stage 5), were included. Agatston score was associated with cfPWV in a univariate regression analysis (p<0.001). So was age (p<0.001) and diabetes (p=0.001), but not gender, smoking status, eGFR, office systolic blood pressure, calcium-phosphate product, C-reactive protein nor vasodilator treatment. Multiple regression analysis including all these factors did not significantly change these associations and relative weight analysis revealed Agatston score to account for 30% of the variation in cfPWV in the model (total r2 =0.31). Conclusion: In a cohort representing the entire spectrum of kidney function, aortic Agatston score, as well as age and diabetes, were associated with cfPWV after adjustment for other risk factors including eGFR. However, most of the variation in cfPWV remains unexplained by these factors.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nyvad et al. (2026) studied this question. Aortic calcification accounts for 30% of the variation in pulse wave velocity, remaining significantly associated across all stages of kidney function even after adjusting for eGFR and covariates.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69be37dd6e48c4981c677cbchttps://doi.org/10.1159/000551429
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper