THE UNIFYING DISCIPLINE OF PHYSICAL INTELLIGIBILITY: the Theory of Objectivity in confrontation with contemporary physics, observational cosmology, and programs of emergent spacetime

This article examines the role of the Theory of Objectivity (TO) as a unifying discipline in the context of contemporary physics. Starting from the dual demand that marks current scientific inquiry—namely, the need to preserve the extraordinary empirical success of general relativity, observational cosmology, and quantum physics, while also addressing persistent ontological and conceptual limits—the paper argues that TO offers a modal-ontological framework capable of critically organizing and disciplining the foundations of physical theory. Rather than proposing an immediate replacement for established physics, the article presents TO as a unifying grammar of intelligibility. In this sense, the Theory of Objectivity is interpreted as a discipline that examines whether the primitives of physical theories—such as spacetime, vacuum, information, gravity, and cosmological origin—are ontologically sufficient and logically clear. The study places TO in dialogue with foundational and recent TO bibliography, as well as with classical and contemporary works in relativity, cosmology, quantum theory, emergent spacetime, and informational approaches to gravity. The article argues that TO is compatible with important contemporary tendencies, especially those that treat spacetime as emergent, relational, or informational. At the same time, it identifies points of tension with theories that absolutize the physical vacuum, cosmological singularity, information, or ad hoc auxiliary entities as ultimate explanatory foundations. These tensions and compatibilities are examined through the modal discipline of TO and articulated with phenomenic elements, Inductor Effects, the cosmogonic theorem, and the cosmological Eras of the Theory of Objectivity. A central assumption of the paper is that the transcendent element may be understood as knowledge or information produced in atomic relations and equivalent to atomic radiations. On this basis, the study proposes that TO allows a broader integration of origin, physical manifestation, memory, consciousness, and scientific intelligibility. The article concludes that the Theory of Objectivity should be understood as a unifying discipline not because it replaces contemporary physics, but because it orders its explanatory claims according to criteria of modal necessity, ontological intelligibility, relational coherence, and operational testability. KeywordsTheory of Objectivity; modal ontology; contemporary physics; unification; cosmology; emergent spacetime; gravity; quantum vacuum; information; phenomenic elements; Inductor Effects; cosmogonic theorem; observational cosmology; philosophy of physics; relational ontology