PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 21, 2026Indian Journal of Psychiatry1 citationsOpen Access

Attitudes of psychiatrists and caregivers towards covert medication administration in India: A cross-sectional study

View Full Paper
NHNishanth M. HulagiRNRaveesh Bevinahalli NanjegowdaENEric O. Noorthoorn

Key Points

  • The study aims to assess the attitudes of Indian psychiatrists and caregivers towards covert medication administration.
  • Conducted as a cross-sectional study at Krishna Rajendra Hospital, Mysuru, India
  • Administered the 15-item Staff and Caregivers Attitude towards Covert Medication Scale (SCACMS) to 90 psychiatrists and 90 caregivers
  • Analyzed data using descriptive statistics, Chi-square tests, Cronbach’s alpha, and Cohen’s Kappa
  • Both psychiatrists and caregivers linked covert medication use to limited resources and security issues
  • 89% indicated that non-compliance was the primary reason for covert medication usage
  • 58% reported that patient awareness of covert medication led to anger
  • 89% of patients had improved outcomes with covert medication administration
  • The SCACMS showed satisfactory reliability for staff (alpha = 0.75) but lower for caregivers (alpha = 0.45)

Abstract

Aim: To assess attitudes of Indian psychiatrists and caregivers toward covert medications (CM) and evaluate the reliability of the Staff and Caregivers Attitude towards Covert Medication Scale (SCACMS) in an Indian context. Materials and Methods: This exploratory cross-sectional study, conducted at Krishna Rajendra Hospital, Mysuru, India, administered the 15-item SCACMS to 90 psychiatrists across India and 90 caregivers from Mysuru. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Chi-square tests, Cronbach’s alpha, and Cohen’s Kappa. Results: Both groups attributed CM use to limited resources and security issues, deeming it appropriate for aggressive patients or those lacking insight. Non-compliance was the primary reason for CM (89%). Patient awareness of CM led to anger in 58% of cases, while 89% improved with CM. The SCACMS showed satisfactory reliability among staff (alpha = 0.75) but less among caregivers (alpha = 0.45). Psychiatrists showed less support for CM compared to caregivers. Conclusion: While psychiatrists and caregivers recognize CM’s utility in specific cases, particularly due to resource scarcity and security concerns, staff show less support for the practice. Findings suggest a need for standardized CM procedures in Indian mental health settings, improved resources, and staff training to potentially reduce CM reliance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hulagi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69be37f16e48c4981c677ecehttps://doi.org/10.4103/indianjpsychiatry_728_24
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper