PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 21, 2026Wellbeing Space and Society0 citationsOpen Access

Happy Colombia, Unhappy Bogota (urban-rural happiness gradient in Colombia)

View Full Paper
AOAdam Okulicz-KozarynLQLina Maria Martínez QuinteroEMEbshoy Mikhaeil

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore the relationship between urban-rural settings and happiness in Colombia.
  • Analyzed data from the Colombian World Values Survey (1998, 2012, 2018)
  • Examined happiness levels across cities and rural areas
  • Controlled for predictors of subjective well-being
  • Weak happiness urban penalty of -0.25 for cities with populations over 500,000
  • Large urban happiness penalty of -0.4 to -0.9 specifically for Bogota
  • Findings suggest cities do not necessarily enhance happiness compared to rural settings

Abstract

• We use the 1998, 2012, and 2018 Colombian World Values Survey • The effect size of the happiness urban penalty is weak -.25 for cities > 500k • The effect size of the happiness urban penalty is large -.4 to -.9 for Bogota. The exploration of life satisfaction across urban-rural gradients has become increasingly important in understanding the nuanced relationship between well-being and geographical settings. Yet many Latin American countries have not received dedicated attention yet. We use the 1998, 2012, and 2018 Colombian World Values Survey to study urban-rural happiness gradient. This is a first such study in Colombia using a dataset with adequate urbanism measures and controlling for SWB predictors. According to economic theories, the Global South cities including Colombian cities are expected to promote more happiness compared to rural areas since cities are the locus of economic activities and offer plenty of opportunities (e.g., jobs and education). We find evidence to the contrary. The effect size of the happiness urban penalty is weak -0.25 for cities > 500k, and large -0.4 to -0.9 for Bogota on 1-10 happiness scale. Results are correlational as in any non-(quasi-)experimental study.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Okulicz-Kozaryn et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69be37f16e48c4981c677feahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.wss.2026.100382
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Happiness surveys: Some comparability issues and an exploratory survey based on just perceivable increments1996 · 217 citations
  2. 2EU 7 FP project Governing urban divercity: Creating social cohesion, social mobility and economic performance in today’s hyper-diversified cities (DIVERCITIES) – The case of Warsaw2017 · 3,196 citations
  3. 3Urban Malaise1973 · 24 citations
  4. 4In defence of degrowth2011 · 921 citations
  5. 5"Urbanism as a Way of Life"1972 · 97 citations