What question did this study set out to answer?

This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of single-port laparoscopic surgery versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for benign ovarian cysts.

March 21, 2026PeerJOpen Access

Comparative analysis of the efficacy of single-port versus traditional multi-port laparoscopic surgery for ovarian cysts : a retrospective cohort study

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

Retrospective cohort study evaluates single-port surgery benefits in ovarian cyst treatment, suggesting improved outcomes.

This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of single-port laparoscopic surgery versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for benign ovarian cysts.
Conducted a retrospective cohort study with 260 patients from January 2022 to September 2025.
Divided patients into single-port (transumbilical) and multi-port groups.
Measured perioperative indicators, inflammatory markers, hospitalization costs, and satisfaction.
Used propensity score matching to reduce bias in outcomes.
Single-port group had significantly lower 24-hour VAS scores and higher abdominal wall satisfaction.
Reduced time to first flatus, ambulation, and shorter hospital stay was observed in the single-port group.
Lower costs and inflammatory markers were noted with single-port surgery.
No significant differences in operative duration, blood loss, and AMH levels between groups.

Xia et al. (2026) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

March 21, 2026PeerJOpen Access

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

Retrospective cohort study evaluates single-port surgery benefits in ovarian cyst treatment, suggesting improved outcomes.

This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of single-port laparoscopic surgery versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for benign ovarian cysts.
Conducted a retrospective cohort study with 260 patients from January 2022 to September 2025.
Divided patients into single-port (transumbilical) and multi-port groups.
Measured perioperative indicators, inflammatory markers, hospitalization costs, and satisfaction.
Used propensity score matching to reduce bias in outcomes.
Single-port group had significantly lower 24-hour VAS scores and higher abdominal wall satisfaction.
Reduced time to first flatus, ambulation, and shorter hospital stay was observed in the single-port group.
Lower costs and inflammatory markers were noted with single-port surgery.
No significant differences in operative duration, blood loss, and AMH levels between groups.

Xia et al. (2026) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark