PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 21, 2026Clinical Epidemiology0 citationsOpen Access

Prevalence and Incidence of Treatment-Range Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Diagnosed in Ontario Between 2012 and 2021: Validating a Population-Based Health Administrative Algorithm for Case Identification in Youth Aged 10–17 Years

JDJennifer DermottTTT. ToLJLiisa Jaakkimainen

Key Points

  • Estimate the prevalence and incidence of treatment-range adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in Ontario youth aged 10-17 by validating a health data algorithm.
  • Developed algorithms from physician billing data using diagnostic and specialty codes.
  • Evaluated algorithms' diagnostic accuracy against a comparator group without scoliosis.
  • Calculated sex- and age-standardized prevalence and incidence using the best-performing algorithm.
  • Applied negative binomial regression to assess annual rate ratios adjusted for age and sex.
  • Median curve magnitude for AIS+ was 35°, indicating severity of the condition.
  • Top algorithm achieved sensitivity of 83.1% and specificity of 99.3%.
  • Average annual prevalence was 513.3/100,000 and incidence was 128.2/100,000.
  • Modest annual increases noted: 1% for prevalence, 2% for incidence, indicating rising trends.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to estimate the prevalence and incidence of treatment-range adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (≥ 20°) over 10-years in Ontario youth 10– 17 years of age, by validating a population-based health administrative data algorithm for case ascertainment. Patients and Methods: Algorithms were developed using a combination of health administrative data: diagnostic, fee and/or specialty codes from physician billing data over various look-back periods. Algorithms’ ability to distinguish between youth with scoliosis, confirmed by a tertiary-care spine specialist (AIS+; n = 2732), and a provincially derived comparator group without (AIS-; n = 49,049) were evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values with their 95% confidence intervals. The top performing algorithm was used to estimate sex- and age-standardized prevalence and incidence between 2012 and 21. Annual rate ratios were calculated using a negative binomial regression model, adjusted for age, sex, and age–sex interaction. Significance was accepted at p < 0.05. Results: The AIS+ cohort had a median curve magnitude of 35° (interquartile range: 25.5– 45.5). Of the 93 algorithms tested, the top was “ 2 physician billing codes for scoliosis in 2 years” with sensitivity: 83.1% (95% CI, 81.6– 84.5%), specificity: 99.3% (95% CI, 99.2– 99.3%), positive predictive value: 86.3% (95% CI, 85.0– 87.6%), negative predictive value: 99.1% (95% CI, 99.0– 99.1%). Annual prevalence estimates averaged 513.3/100 000 and incidence 128.2/100 000. There was a modest annual increase in the adjusted rate ratios: 1% for prevalence, 2% for incidence. Rates were highest for females at 13-years and males at 15-years of age, with rates 65% lower for males. Conclusion: The selected health administrative data algorithm demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy in identifying radiographically confirmed, treatment-range adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in 10– 17-year-old youth. This is an efficient and scalable method for clinically meaningful population-level cohort creation that will facilitate surveillance of scoliosis diagnostic and treatment trends and longitudinal outcome research. Keywords: epidemiology, validation study, routinely collected health data, diagnosis

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dermott et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69be387d6e48c4981c678fa2https://doi.org/10.2147/clep.s578144
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper