Indoor air quality (IAQ) in educational buildings plays a critical role in the health, cognitive performance, and well-being of occupants. Aging university facilities often rely on outdated ventilation systems that are not designed to meet current demands or respond to dynamic occupancy levels. This study investigates the performance and feasibility of various advanced ventilation strategies in comparison to an existing balanced mechanical ventilation (BMV) system in a university classroom accommodating 100 students. Using a Dynamic Building Energy Simulation Program, simulations were conducted to evaluate IAQ (using CO2 levels), energy consumption, and thermal comfort under three retrofitting scenarios: BMV, demand-controlled ventilation (DCV), and hybrid ventilation combining natural and mechanical airflow. The simulations indicate that DCV cuts annual HVAC energy use by 33% relative to the baseline, while the hybrid strategy achieves the greatest reduction of 42% and maintains CO2 levels and thermal comfort within recommended limits. Although hybrid systems provide seasonal advantages, their complexity may limit applicability. In addition to technical analysis, this study also explores the financial and tax-related challenges associated with retrofitting ventilation systems in university buildings. Investment payback periods, operational costs, and potential tax incentives are discussed to evaluate economic viability. Overall, the endorse hybrid ventilation as the most cost-effective strategy where mixed-mode control is feasible, and DCV as a practical alternative for buildings unable to employ natural ventilation.
Turhan et al. (2026) studied this question.