An interactive deep learning system for myocardial scar segmentation achieved expert-level accuracy (Dice similarity coefficient 0.74±0.10) and reduced segmentation time to 65±34 seconds per patient.
Does an interactive deep learning system improve the accuracy, repeatability, and speed of myocardial scar segmentation in patients with chronic myocardial infarction compared to conventional methods?
348 patients with chronic myocardial infarction (244 training, 51 validation, 53 test)
Interactive deep learning system for scar segmentation and quantification, incorporating prompt-guided segmentation and a vision foundation model adapted for medical imaging
Expert manual annotations (reference standard) and conventional full-width at half-maximum method (FWHM)
Segmentation accuracy (Dice similarity coefficient, Hausdorff distance) and median scar mass error on a held-out test setsurrogate
An interactive deep learning system provides fast, accurate, and highly reproducible myocardial scar quantification from LGE-CMR, outperforming conventional methods in repeatability and speed.
Following myocardial infarction, late gadolinium-enhancement (LGE) assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) provides a reliable metric for risk stratification and therapeutic planning. However, conventional segmentation methods are time-consuming and labor-intensive, with high interobserver variability and inconsistent performance in routine clinical practice. This study sought to develop an interactive deep learning system for scar segmentation and quantification. The framework was developed and evaluated using LGE-CMR images from 348 patients with chronic myocardial infarction (244 training, 51 validation, 53 test). The model incorporates prompt-guided segmentation and leverages a vision foundation model adapted for medical imaging, integrated into a clinician-facing interface for real-time interaction, and automated quantification. Training used a composite loss function combining Dice overlap, voxel-wise cross-entropy, and Kullback–Leibler divergence against soft labels to address annotation uncertainty. Performance was evaluated on a held-out test set using expert manual annotations as the reference standard, with assessment of segmentation accuracy, repeatability, and agreement with the conventional full-width at half-maximum method (FWHM). The framework achieved expert-level segmentation performance on the test set (Dice similarity coefficient=0.74±0.10; Hausdorff distance=5.87±6.79 mm) with median scar mass error of 1.28 g (IQR 0.74–2.34), corresponding to 1.4% (IQR 0.81–2.47) of left ventricular mass. Repeatability analysis (n=41) demonstrated excellent agreement, with both inter- and intra-observer concordance correlation coefficients of 0.999 (compared with 0.737 and 0.952, respectively, for the conventional FWHM). Segmentation time was substantially reduced when using the interactive tool compared with the conventional workflow, averaging 65 ± 34 seconds per patient. Performance and repeatability remained high across the test set with differing levels of image quality. The proposed framework for scar segmentation with a human-in-the-loop design enables fast, accurate, and highly reproducible myocardial scar quantification from LGE-CMR. This may provide more consistent performance in routine clinical workflows.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Moafi et al. (Sun,) conducted a other in chronic myocardial infarction (n=348). Interactive deep learning system for scar segmentation vs. Expert manual annotations and conventional full-width at half-maximum method (FWHM) was evaluated on Segmentation accuracy (Dice similarity coefficient, Hausdorff distance), repeatability, and agreement with FWHM. An interactive deep learning system for myocardial scar segmentation achieved expert-level accuracy (Dice similarity coefficient 0.74±0.10) and reduced segmentation time to 65±34 seconds per patient.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69bf86ecf665edcd009e90f4 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocmr.2026.102720
Aida Moafi
Danial Moafi
Simran Shergill
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
University of Copenhagen
University of Leicester
University of Siena
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...