Abstract Purpose ¹⁸FFDG PET/CT has been widely used in oncology for diagnosis and treatment monitoring. Reduced cerebral ¹⁸FFDG uptake has been observed in patients with disseminated malignancies, potentially associated with the Warburg effect and elevated lactate levels. This study investigated the prognostic relevance of the brain-to-liver ¹⁸FFDG uptake ratio (BLR) in MM patients who underwent PET/CT at diagnosis. Methods BLR was calculated as the ratio between the mean standardized uptake value (SUV) of the whole brain and that of the liver. A total of 72 patients were retrospectively included in the study (58% male; median age 65 years (IQR55;70); 67% were classified as ISS stage III). Results BLR, as a continuous variable, showed a statistically significant difference between groups according to sex ( p = 0.004), overweight status ( p = 0.005), and ISS stage ( p = 0.03), and was negatively correlated with β₂-microglobulin ( r = − 0.42, p 2.7 demonstrated superior 60-month overall survival (52%vs.10%, p = 0.002) and progression-free survival (19%vs.3%, p = 0.003), respectively. Multivariate Cox regression confirmed BLR (HR 1.86 95%CI: 1.03–3.33, p = 0.038 (OS); HR 1.93 95%CI: 1.13–3.29, p = 0.016 (PFS))as an independent factor and the use of autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) as consolidation for both OS and PFS. In addition, ISS stage III was also a prognostic factor for OS. Conclusion Higher brain-to-liver ¹⁸FFDG uptake ratio (> 2.7) at diagnosis predicts better clinical outcomes in multiple myeloma. BLR is significantly associated with established clinical markers of tumor burden in multiple myeloma. These findings suggest that BLR is a feasible and reproducible metric with potential prognostic value in multiple myeloma.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Maria Emilia S. Takahashi
Tiago Santos
C Cralcev
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Takahashi et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69bf899af665edcd009e9749 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-026-07844-z
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: