PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 23, 2026Polymer Composites0 citations

Effects of Weave Structure, Weft Density, Laying Method, and Gradient Structure on the Ballistic Performance of 3D Angle‐Interlock Aramid/Epoxy Composites

View Full Paper
YXYixuan XieHCHongxia ChenHFHaihong Fu

Key Points

  • This research aims to enhance ballistic performance through innovative composite structures.
  • Developed a three‐dimensional angle‐interlocked aramid/epoxy composite
  • Examined various laying methods and gradient structures
  • Compared ballistic performance against traditional composites
  • 3DAI composites demonstrate superior ballistic performance
  • High‐weft‐density composites yield the best performance
  • Orthogonal configuration effectively dissipates energy

Abstract

ABSTRACT Although conventional two‐dimensional fiber‐reinforced polymer composites are commonly used in ballistic protection, they frequently suffer from delamination and poor in‐plane shear performance. Herein, we developed a three‐dimensional angle‐interlocked (3DAI) aramid/epoxy composite for bulletproof vehicle applications. The ballistic performance of the 3DAI composites is critically influenced by their programmable fabric structure, laying methods (unidirectional, orthogonal, symmetric, and sandwich), and gradient structures utilizing stacking layers with varying weft densities. The 3DAI aramid/epoxy composite exhibits superior ballistic performance, structural design flexibility, delamination resistance, and a smaller damage area, along with a reduction in the number of layers required compared to plain weave composites. The high‐weft‐density composites demonstrated the best overall ballistic performance and the highest resistance to impact deformation. The orthogonal configuration strategy was found to be the most effective in dissipating energy and provided the optimal ballistic protection. Moreover, the graded structure integrating high‐ and low‐weft‐density layers exhibited superior ballistic performance relative to the uniform design. The best anti‐denting performance was achieved when the high‐weft‐density layer was placed on the bullet‐facing side and the low‐weft‐density layer on the back side. These findings provide new insights into the armor‐grade composite and advanced ballistic composites.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xie et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c08bcaa48f6b84677f98fahttps://doi.org/10.1002/pc.71026
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper