PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 23, 2026Procedia Computer Science0 citationsOpen Access

Evaluating the Educational and Cultural Risks of Generative AI Videos in Arabic Learning Contexts

View Full Paper
MAMohamed AbdelrehimAl Ain UniversityGSGhada SalihAl Ain UniversityKSKhaled ShaalanUniversity of Dubai

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the risks associated with generative AI-produced videos in Arabic educational contexts, focusing on linguistic and cultural accuracy.
  • Developed a conceptual framework to evaluate educational risks of generative AI videos
  • Employed a pilot pipeline integrating various AI technologies for error analysis
  • Created an Arabic-specific error taxonomy and assessed automated detection reliability
  • Implemented a triage mechanism with automated checkpoints for safety
  • Identified common error modes such as dialect mismatches and semantic drift
  • Demonstrated the importance of human validation to address error propagation
  • Highlighted the necessity for context-specific evaluation and scalable validation workflows

Abstract

Generative AI has rapidly expanded the production of narrated educational videos, yet their linguistic accuracy, cultural fidelity, and pedagogical risks remain underexamined—particularly in Arabic-learning contexts. This paper proposes a conceptual framework for evaluating these risks by integrating findings on multimodal error pathways, Arabic-specific linguistic challenges, and automated detection–mitigation strategies. Using a pilot pipeline (GPT-4 → diffusion video synthesis → neural TTS → ASR → automated detectors → human validation), we model how linguistic, semantic, and visual errors propagate across modules and influence learner comprehension. The framework defines an Arabic-grounded error taxonomy, assesses detector reliability, and applies severity-weighted scoring to estimate pedagogical impact. It also introduces a multi-stage triage mechanism using automated checkpoints calibrated to institutional safety thresholds to support responsible deployment. Although the empirical sample is limited, the analysis highlights recurring error modes, especially dialect/register mismatches and script-level semantic drift, and identifies bottlenecks where human-in-the-loop review remains essential. The paper concludes with recommendations for classroom testing, dialect-aware evaluation, and scalable validation workflows. Overall, this work offers a structured approach for safely integrating generative AI into Arabic education by addressing error propagation, cultural alignment, and instructional risk in a systematic and context-appropriate manner.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Abdelrehim et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c0de74fddb9876e79c1413https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2026.01.085
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper