PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 23, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Effects of Boko Haram Insurgency on Livelihood Restoration Activities Among Farmers in Michika Local Government Area of Adamawa State, Nigeria

View Full Paper
DMDavid Chinda MauriceVJVosen Columba JUDECCChristy COLUMBA

Key Points

  • The research aims to assess the impact of Boko Haram insurgency on farmers' livelihood restoration activities in Michika, Nigeria.
  • Random sampling of 128 farming households
  • Data analysis using descriptive statistics
  • Simpson Index of Diversification
  • Garrett ranking
  • Paired sample t-test
  • Significant decline in agricultural production due to insurgency
  • Reduction in crop yields: groundnut (-274%), maize (-34.8%)
  • Decrease in livestock numbers: sheep (-85%) and poultry (-73.7%)
  • Shift in income sources: agriculture dropped from 90% to 51%
  • Asset repair (91.4%) and input distribution (85.2%) were the main interventions received

Abstract

This study assessed the effects of Boko Haram insurgency on livelihood restoration activities among farmers in Michika LGA, Adamawa State, Nigeria. A random sampling technique was used to select 128 farming households. Data was analysed using descriptive statistics, the Simpson Index of Diversification (SID), Garrett ranking and a paired sample t-test. The findings revealed a significant decline in agricultural production due to insurgency, with significant reductions in crop yields such as; groundnut (-274%), maize (-34.8%) and livestock numbers; sheep (-85%) and poultry (-73.7%). Consequently, the primary income source shifted drastically; agriculture contributed 90% of income pre-insurgency but only 51% afterwards, indicating a forced diversification into non-farm activities. The most common restoration interventions received were asset repair (91.4%) and input distribution (85.2%), while critical support like micro-credit (29.7%) and psychosocial aid (21.9%) was severely lacking. Major constraints identified were insurgency itself, pest attacks and inadequate extension services. The study concluded that the insurgency severely crippled agricultural livelihoods and recovery remain fragile. It recommends that government agencies (Ministry of Agriculture, NEMA) and development partners (NGOs, SMEDAN) move beyond short-term aid. Interventions should prioritise a holistic approach integrating enhanced credit access, extension services, psychosocial support, and a multi-sectoral strategy to improve security and infrastructure for sustainable livelihood restoration.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Maurice et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c0e007fddb9876e79c1711https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.396330
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1EFFECTS OF BOKO HARAM ON THE LIVELIHOODS OF FARMING HOUSEHOLDS IN JERE LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA OF BORNO STATE, NIGERIA2024
  2. 2Insecurity and Women's Livelihoods in Borno State, Nigeria: A Socioeconomic Analysis of Conflict Impacts2025
  3. 3The <i>Boko Haram</i> Insurgency and Its Effects on Crop Production in Northeast, Nigeria2025
  4. 4Assessment of farm resources and livelihood strategies adopted in mitigating crop farmers’ food insecurity during insurgency in North-eastern Nigeria2024
  5. 5Socio-Economic Impact on Host Communities in Adamawa and Borno States, Nigeria2024