PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 24, 2026International Journal of Keratoconus and Ectatic Corneal Diseases0 citationsOpen Access

Modification of Corneal Biomechanics in Keratoconus and Healthy Corneas in Relation to Age, IOP, and Pachymetry in a North African Population: A Case–Control Study

BOBilal OmariCKChaimae KhodrissDKDesire Kouadio

Key Points

  • The study aims to assess how age, sex, intraocular pressure, and central corneal thickness influence corneal biomechanical measurements in keratoconus and normal eyes.
  • Conducted a prospective observational case-control study with 100 normal eyes and 107 keratoconus eyes.
  • Utilized Corvis ST for biomechanical assessments including SSIv2, CBI, and CBiF.
  • Applied Spearman's correlation and quantile regression to analyze relationships with age, sex, IOP, and CCT.
  • Developed new biomechanical parameters through linear regression less affected by IOP and CCT.
  • Strong correlations found between IOP and stiffness parameter (r = 0.634) in normal eyes, and between IOP and deformation amplitude in keratoconus (r = -0.728).
  • CCT exhibited a strong negative correlation with TBI in normal corneas (r = -0.679) and a negative correlation with CBiF in keratoconus (r = -0.670).
  • Age showed weak correlations, while sex had no significant impact on biomechanical parameters.
  • ARTh and SSIv2 were less influenced by IOP and CCT, showing reduced correlation strengths post-correction.

Abstract

Aims and background:To evaluate the influence of age, sex, intraocular pressure (IOP), and central corneal thickness (CCT) on corneal biomechanical parameters, including stress and strain index version 2 (SSIv2), Corvis biomechanical index (CBI), and Corvis biomechanical factor (CBiF), in keratoconus and normal corneas in a North African population.Materials and methods: Prospective observational case-control study included 100 normal eyes and 107 keratoconus eyes.Each eye was subjected to Corvis ST examination to determine biomechanical parameters, including the new indices SSIv2 and CBiF.Spearman's correlation and a quantile regression model were used to evaluate relationships between biomechanical parameters and age, sex, IOP, and CCT.A linear regression was used to create new biomechanical parameters that are less dependent on IOP and CCT.Results: Intraocular pressure and CCT were the two parameters most strongly associated with biomechanical measures in both the normal and keratoconus groups.In the normal group, the strongest associations were observed between stiffness parameter (SP) and IOP (r = 0.634, p < 0.001), and between tomographic and biomechanical index (TBI) and CCT (r = -0.679,p < 0.001).In contrast, in the keratoconus group, the strongest associations were found between deformation amplitude (DA) and IOP (r = -0.728,p < 0.001), and between CBiF and CCT (r = -0.670,p < 0.001).Age exhibited weak correlations with a limited number of biomechanical parameters in both groups (all r < 0.294).Sex showed no significant influence on any biomechanical parameters in either group.Among the parameters studied, Ambrsio relational thickness (ARTh) and SSIv2 were the least affected by IOP and CCT, respectively.Furthermore, the corrected variables demonstrated substantially weaker correlations with IOP and CCT compared to their original version (all r < 0.244). Conclusion:Our study highlights the significant influence of age, IOP, and CCT on corneal biomechanical indices in both normal and keratoconus eyes.We propose, for the first time, a correction method for combined biomechanical indices aimed at minimizing the confounding effects of IOP and CCT, thereby enhancing their reliability in clinical assessment.Clinical significance: Intraocular pressure and CCT should be considered confounding factors in corneal biomechanical evaluations conducted in clinical practice, such as screening for refractive surgery and keratoconus.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Omari et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c229a5aeb5a845df0d471chttps://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10025-1220
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Corneal biomechanical responses detected using corvis st in primary open angle glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma2020 · 22 citations
  2. 2Cataract surgery causes biomechanical alterations to the eye detectable by Corvis ST tonometry2017 · 26 citations
  3. 3Corneal thickness: measurement and implications2003 · 98 citations
  4. 4Corneal Biomechanics as a Function of Intraocular Pressure and Pachymetry by Dynamic Infrared Signal and Scheimpflug Imaging Analysis in Normal Eyes2014 · 179 citations
  5. 5Keratoconus: The ABCD Grading System2016 · 363 citations