Passive foot flexions significantly increased holding time during a repeated isometric task compared to passive rest (67.7 vs. 52.9 s; p<0.05) and enhanced parasympathetic modulation.
Do passive foot flexions improve performance recovery and muscular oxygenation in physically active men following an isometric task?
Passive foot flexions during recovery significantly improve subsequent isometric holding time and enhance parasympathetic modulation compared to passive rest.
Background: Passive movement-based recovery strategies may support post-exercise recovery without additional metabolic demand. Objective: To examine the acute effects of passive foot flexions during recovery on isometric task performance after repeated exercise. Methods: Fourteen physically active men completed two randomized crossover sessions—passive rest and passive foot flexions—separated by a 7-day washout. Each session included a sustained static isometric plantar flexion task at 75% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), a 15 min recovery period, and a repeated isometric task. Work capacity was assessed as holding time. Cardiovascular, autonomic, and peripheral responses were recorded throughout the protocol. Results: Baseline holding time did not differ between the conditions. During the repeated isometric task, holding time was significantly longer following passive foot flexions compared to passive rest (67.7 ± 10.4 s vs. 52.9 ± 9.7 s; p < 0.05), with a large effect size (d ≈ 1.5). Passive foot flexions were associated with a greater increase in parasympathetic modulation, reflected by higher root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) during recovery and altered muscle oxygenation dynamics, including faster post-exercise re-oxygenation. For both conditions, heart rate and systolic and diastolic blood pressure exhibited similar exercise–recovery patterns with no between-condition differences. Only minor changes in muscle stiffness were observed following the passive foot flexions. Conclusions: Passive foot flexions may support short-term recovery between repeated isometric efforts, particularly with respect to holding time and RMSSD.
Trinkūnas et al. (2026) studied this question. Passive foot flexions significantly increased holding time during a repeated isometric task compared to passive rest (67.7 vs. 52.9 s; p<0.05) and enhanced parasympathetic modulation.