Melanoma is a global health issue, with an increasing incidence in recent years. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs, e.g., antiprogrammed cell death protein 1 PD-1) and targeted therapies (e.g., BRAF/MEK inhibitors) have revolutionized treatment for melanoma patients (MPs), but prognostic markers of drug response and disease progression remain elusive. We conducted a prospective baseline and follow-up study to investigate peripheral blood neutrophils and monocytes as immune biomarkers in stage III MPs receiving either anti-PD-1 therapy or B-type rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma (BRAF)/mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitors. Sixty-four stage III MPs were prospectively recruited, of whom 42 received anti-PD-1 therapy, and 22 received BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Neutrophils and monocytes were isolated and analyzed by flow cytometry, while plasma concentrations of neutrophil-related mediators and neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) biomarkers were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). In MPs, neutrophils displayed an activated phenotype (CD16+ CD62L-), and both neutrophils and monocytes had higher PD-1 ligand (PD-L1) expression, compared with healthy controls (HCs). Importantly, higher percentages of CD16+ CD62L- and PD-L1+ neutrophils and PD-L1+ monocytes-but not higher levels of neutrophil-related mediators and NET biomarkers-were associated with disease progression only in MPs treated with anti-PD-1 therapy but not in those treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors. This study reveals that a specific neutrophil and monocyte phenotype can predict clinical responses exclusively in ICI-treated patients, highlighting their potential as prognostic biomarkers before starting the immune checkpoint inhibition in melanoma.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Annagioia Ventrici
Luca Modestino
Leonardo Cristinziano
Journal of Immunology Research
University of Naples Federico II
Federico II University Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ventrici et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69c37be2b34aaaeb1a67eacb — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/jimr/3825424
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: