AI systems often exhibit inconsistent and non-reproducible behavior due to implicit assumptions, incomplete data usage, and uncontrolled reasoning processes. This lack of reproducibility limits auditability, trust, and practical deployment in critical domains. This paper introduces DRS (Data-Rules-Signals), a structural framework designed to enforce reproducibility in AI decision-making. DRS decomposes AI processes into three explicitly defined layers: Data (inputs), Rules (constraints), and Signals (derived features). By externalizing and enforcing these components, DRS enables consistent, auditable, and reproducible outputs across AI systems. The framework also provides a systematic way to identify failure modes, categorized into Data failure, Rules failure, and Signal failure. DRS offers a practical foundation for building reliable AI systems in domains where consistency and traceability are critical.
Takayasu Komuro (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: