PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 26, 2026Neural Computing and Applications0 citationsOpen Access

Constructing a multimodal feature set for pain intensity classification

SNSören NienaberHWHuibin WangLDLaslo Dinges

Key Points

  • The central aim is to improve pain intensity classification by integrating various biosignal modalities into a multimodal feature set.
  • Introduced a multimodal feature set (MMFS) combining features from BioVid and X-ITE databases.
  • Conducted experiments to evaluate classification accuracy across different pain levels.
  • Performed confusion matrix analyses and a modality ablation study to assess individual contribution of features.
  • Achieved up to 8% increase in overall classification accuracy.
  • Recorded a 6% improvement when evaluating all pain levels collectively.
  • Identified key features influencing predictions, especially for challenging pain classes.

Abstract

Abstract Previous approaches to pain intensity classification have typically relied on small sets of top-performing features to maximize accuracy. While effective in constrained scenarios, such strategies neglect the diverse range of modalities available in modern pain databases. In this work, we introduce a multimodal feature set (MMFS) that integrates heterogeneous features from each biosignal modality in the BioVid and X-ITE databases. Our approach captures a broad spectrum of complementary information, maintaining robustness even when individual modalities are unavailable. Experimental results show consistent performance improvements, with classification accuracy increasing by up to 8% overall and by 6% when evaluating all pain levels. Through detailed analyses of individual modalities, confusion matrices, and a modality ablation study, we demonstrate that the combined effect of multimodality and balanced information distribution drives these gains. Furthermore, feature importance analysis reveals which inputs contribute most to final predictions and which features are most beneficial for the more challenging pain classes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nienaber et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c4cc98fdc3bde448918038https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-026-11962-y
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1An Automatic System for Continuous Pain Intensity Monitoring Based on Analyzing Data from Uni-, Bi-, and Multi-Modality2022 · 26 citations
  2. 2Beyond Pain Intensity Scores: A Systematic Review of Multimodal Digital Neurophysiological Sensors for Objective Pain Assessment in the Clinical Application2025
  3. 3Dual-stream transformer approach for pain assessment using visual-physiological data modeling2025
  4. 4Advancing Multimodal Data Fusion in Pain Recognition: A Strategy Leveraging Statistical Correlation and Human-Centered Perspectives2024
  5. 5Multimodal automatic assessment of acute pain through facial videos and heart rate signals utilizing transformer-based architectures2024 · 14 citations