PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 26, 2026International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry0 citationsOpen Access

Comparative Evaluation of Bond Strength of Bioflx Crowns with Resinous and Nonresinous Luting Agents on Primary Teeth: An In Vitro Study

ATAditi TasgaonkarNRNilesh RathiPAPriyanka V Agrawal

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate and compare the shear bond strengths of Bioflx crowns on primary teeth using different luting agents.
  • Bioflx blocks were luted on 45 extracted primary teeth.
  • Samples were divided into three groups based on luting agents: glass ionomer cement, RelyX U200, and ACTIVA.
  • Shear bond strength was measured using a universal testing machine after thermocycling.
  • RelyX U200 had the highest mean shear bond strength of 1.41 MPa.
  • ACTIVA showed a mean strength of 1.31 MPa.
  • Glass ionomer cement exhibited a significantly lower mean strength of 0.32 MPa.
  • Post hoc analysis confirmed significant differences between GIC and both resin-based groups.

Abstract

Aims and background: Preserving primary teeth with crowns is vital in pediatric dentistry, especially for those compromised by dental caries, previous treatments, or malformations.To address the limitations of traditional esthetic crowns, Bioflx crowns have been available as a new, durable, esthetic, and self-adaptable preformed option for usage in pediatric dentistry.This in vitro study aimed to evaluate and compare the shear bond strengths of Bioflx crowns luted on primary teeth using different luting agents.Materials and methods: Bioflx blocks measuring 4 4 mm were luted on 45 extracted primary teeth using three different luting agents, based on which the 45 samples were divided into three groups: group I, glass ionomer cement (GIC) (GC Corp., Japan); group II, RelyX U200 (3M ESPE, Germany); and group III, ACTIVA (PulpDent, USA).A universal testing machine was used to measure the shear bond strength following the specimen thermocycling.Results: We found notable differences in the groups' shear bond strengths, with RelyX U200 and ACTIVA exhibiting much higher mean values (1.41 and 1.31 MPa, respectively) compared with GIC (0.32 MPa).Post hoc analysis revealed that group I (GIC) was significantly different from both groups II (RelyX U200) and III (ACTIVA), whereas no significant difference was observed between resinous luting agent groups. Conclusion:Resin-based luting agents were found to be superior to non-resinous agents in the luting of Bioflx polymer to primary teeth.Clinical significance: This study highlights the significance of bond strength when using various resin-based and non-resin-based luting agents on an advanced polymer crown designed specifically for pediatric dentistry.The bonding of Bioflx crowns with primary dentition remains a largely unexplored area, and this study offers valuable insights that pediatric dentists can effectively apply in clinical practice.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tasgaonkar et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c4ccc9fdc3bde448918478https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3480
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1BioFlx Pediatric Crowns: Current Evidence on Clinical Outcomes and Material Properties2025
  2. 2Comparative evaluation of stress generation in primary teeth restored with zirconia and BioFlx crowns: A finite element analysis2024 · 7 citations
  3. 3Clinical and In Vitro Performance of Bioflx Crowns in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review2026
  4. 4Comparative evaluation of antagonistic enamel wear against Zirconia and Bioflx in primary teeth: An in vitro study2026
  5. 5Clinical performance of Bioflx versus stainless steel crowns in primary mandibular second molars: a randomized controlled trial2026