PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 26, 2026Procedia Computer Science0 citationsOpen Access

Top box vs. brand selection vs. yes/no: Survey options for purchase intentions that are highly predictive of purchase behavior

View Full Paper
TKTakumi KatoSMShinya MinegishiRKRyo Kobayashi

Key Points

  • The aim is to determine the most effective survey method for predicting actual purchase behavior.
  • Examined survey presentation methods across four industries in Japan.
  • Compared top-box and brand selection approaches with yes/no questions.
  • Analyzed psychological barriers affecting purchase intention expression.
  • Brand selection with top-box approach shows high predictive accuracy for purchase behavior.
  • Yes/no questions effectively identify potential buyers with less psychological resistance.
  • Proper survey design can enhance demand forecasting in various markets.

Abstract

The effectiveness of the method of presenting options in a purchase intention survey, essential for demand forecasting, is examined in four industries in Japan: tea, beer, cafes, and restaurants. To improve the prediction accuracy of actual purchasing behavior, brand selection should be adopted with a top-box or single-answer approach. These methods present a high psychological barrier to positively expressing purchase intention in the survey. However, to comprehensively identify people who will actually purchase, a yes/no question should be adopted. This is because, as a two-choice question, researchers can confirm the intention to purchase multiple brands without giving ambiguous answers, as with the top-2-box or multiple answers. Moreover, because the psychological barrier is not as high as that with a top-box or single answer, there is less chance of missing out on buyers. Practitioners must design options for purchase intention questions based on their market research purpose.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kato et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c4ccc9fdc3bde448918537https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2026.03.010
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Determinants of the intention to purchase sustainable beer: Do gender and type of sustainable solution matter?2024 · 21 citations
  2. 2Social media services branding: The use of corporate brand names2019 · 36 citations
  3. 3Measuring and Accounting for Cross-Country Response Biases in Marketing Food and Drink Products2010 · 4 citations
  4. 4Solving the Mystery of Consistent Negative/Low Net Promoter Score (NPS) in Cross-Cultural Marketing Research2016 · 14 citations
  5. 5How Concept Knowledge Affects Concept Evaluation1984 · 6 citations