PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 26, 2026Journal of structural design and construction practice.0 citations

Influence of Nonlinear Soil–Structure Interaction on the Seismic Response of a RC Floating Columns Structure with Geotechnical Isolation and Shear Wall Systems

View Full Paper
PJPalani JaganJVJoseph Antony Visuvasam

Key Points

  • The aim is to investigate the seismic response of reinforced concrete floating column structures considering soil-structure interactions.
  • Conducted three-dimensional finite-element analysis
  • Implemented nonlinear soil models using an elastoplastic hysteretic model
  • Performed a parametric study on GSI layer thickness and ground motion characteristics
  • Evaluated the impact of sand-rubber mixtures and shear wall configurations
  • GSI-SRM layer with 0.15B thickness reduced spectral acceleration by 40%
  • Lateral story displacement decreased by 36% under SSI
  • Base shear was reduced by 39% compared to fixed-base conditions

Abstract

Nonlinear soil properties are crucial in seismic structural responses, revealing the interdependence between soil and structure during seismic events. Floating column structures are significantly more vulnerable to seismic activity compared to traditional fixed-base structures due to soil–structure interaction (SSI). Despite the growing prevalence of reinforced concrete structures with floating columns in urban areas, their seismic performance and protection, especially under SSI effects, remain largely unexplored. This three-dimensional finite-element analysis study aims to enhance the seismic performance of reinforced floating column structures by introducing a novel approach that combines geotechnical seismic isolation (GSI) systems with sand–rubber mixtures (SRM) and shear wall systems. Soil nonlinearity was modeled using an advanced isotropic hardening elastoplastic hysteretic constitutive model. A parametric study evaluated the impact of GSI layer thickness, ground motion characteristics, and geogrid layers on the seismic demands of floating column structures. The analysis results show that a GSI-SRM layer with a thickness of 0.15B (where B is the width of the foundation), combined with double-layered geogrids and shear walls, significantly reduces seismic demands. This configuration lowers spectral acceleration and lateral story displacement by up to 40% and 36%, respectively, under SSI, and decreases base shear by 39% compared to fixed-base conditions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jagan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c4ccc9fdc3bde44891856bhttps://doi.org/10.1061/jsdccc.sceng-1806
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper