PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 26, 2026Procedia Computer Science0 citationsOpen Access

A case study of using Project Management Maturity Models to assess Project Management Practices and define future improvements in R&D&I centers

View Full Paper
GSG Felgueiras e SousaAPAlberto M. PereiraJRJosé Salgado Rodrigues

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess project management maturity in R&D&I centers to identify improvement opportunities.
  • Conducted a single-case study at a multidisciplinary R&D&I center in Portugal.
  • Applied a three-phase methodology: selection of maturity model, data collection, and analysis.
  • Used document analysis, a structured questionnaire with 40 questions, and semi-structured interviews.
  • The center was assessed at Maturity Level 3 (Institutionalized Process).
  • Strengths identified included project awareness and training processes.
  • Weaknesses were noted in tool usage, documentation, risk analysis, and governance.

Abstract

Research, Development, and Innovation (R&D&I) centers play a pivotal role in bridging academia and industry, often operating in high-uncertainty environments with diverse stakeholders. Despite their innovation-driven missions, these R&D&I centers face recurring challenges in project management and execution. Literature suggests that project management maturity is closely linked to project success. This research addresses whether assessing project management maturity can provide actionable insights and guide improvement strategies. A single-case study was conducted at a multidisciplinary R&D&I center based in Portugal. A three-phase use case methodology was applied: (1) selecting a maturity model and diagnostic tools, (2) collecting data through document analysis, a 40-question structured questionnaire (n=17), and semi-structured interviews (n=5), and (3) analyzing results and defining an improvement plan for project management processes. The (PM)² Maturity Model was used to assess five dimensions of project management maturity. Findings placed the center at Maturity Level 3 (Institutionalized Process), with strengths in project awareness and training process, but weaknesses in tool usage, documentation, risk analysis, and governance. Interviews validated these findings and highlighted improvement opportunities. This single-case study supports the use of maturity models as effective roadmaps for enhancing project management in R&D&I environments and offers guidance for implementing structured improvement strategies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sousa et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c4ccc9fdc3bde448918598https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2026.03.198
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Useful Project Management Practices in Collaborative R&D&I Projects2024 · 2 citations
  2. 2Project Management Maturity: An Industry Benchmark2003 · 138 citations
  3. 3The unsettling of “settled science:” The past and future of the management of projects2015 · 83 citations
  4. 4Project Management Process Maturity (PM)2 Model2002 · 242 citations
  5. 5Exploring the value of project management: Linking Project Management Performance and Project Success2013 · 602 citations