PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 26, 2026Critical Care Medicine0 citations

1070: Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Heparin Levels in Pediatric Patients

View Full Paper
JLJiacheng LiuABAlexander A. BoucherHBHarsha Battula

Key Points

  • The aim is to predict anticoagulation parameters for heparinized pediatric patients using machine learning and prior clinical data.
  • Analyzed all heparin infusions ≥6 hours from 2011-2024 across an academic health system.
  • Developed a variational recurrent neural network (vRNN) model using prior clinical data and heparin dosages.
  • Categorized coagulation parameters into low, normal, and high based on clinical standards.
  • VNN achieved AUROC values of 0.77, 0.75, and 0.79 for low, normal, and high coagulation parameters in pediatric validation.
  • Bleeding complications were documented in 11.2% of children during heparin infusions.
  • Clotting complications occurred in 21.1% of pediatric cases.

Abstract

Introduction: Heparin infusion requires regular laboratory monitoring, a challenge in pediatric care due to risk of iatrogenic anemia. We hypothesized that machine learning models could predict anticoagulation parameters for heparinized children using a patient’s own prior clinical data, with the ultimate hypothesis that this could reduce lab frequency without increasing complications. Methods: All heparin infusions ≥6 hours for inpatients within an academic health system, regardless of patient age, between 2011-2024 were used for modeling of a variational recurrent neural network (vRNN). Input variables included heparin dosage (and prior adjustments, medication holds, etc), selected medications, demographics, and prior coagulation parameters. We used one-hot encoding for categorical features and converted numerical features to percentiles. Three classes were defined for the patient’s coagulation parameters given clinical standards: low (anti-XA level 0.7 or PTT level > 99s); a separate classifier was used for each. We used a “nowcast” approach, predicting the class label at collection time. Patients were partitioned into training and validation cohorts stratified by age and complication rates. Results: Heparin infusions occurred 28,789 times for 15,079 patients (1,125 infusions in children 1-18 years and 1,006 in infants < 1 year). Median age was 62 years (IQR 50-74) and median heparin duration was 36.5 hours (IQR 19-67), with longer durations in those < 18 years than adults (p< 0.01). Anti-Xa was the most common lab test (93% of all heparin infusions) followed by PTT (26%). Coagulation parameters were measured a median 2.2 times per day (IQR 1.4-2.9) across the heparin infusion period. Bleeding complications were documented in 81 children (11.2%) during heparin infusions while 153 (21.1%) had clotting complications. The vRNN achieved AUROC of 0.77, 0.75, 0.79 for predicting low, normal, and high coagulation parameters, respectively, in the pediatric validation cohort. Conclusions: This vRNN predicts coagulation parameters for heparinized children with acceptable AUROC. These data suggest that computer modeling could potentially be used to reduce lab monitoring frequency for heparinized pediatric patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c4ccf7fdc3bde448918ad9https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0001186276.51207.ff
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Toward Optimal Heparin Dosing by Comparing Multiple Machine Learning Methods: Retrospective Study2020 · 29 citations
  2. 2A Recurrent Neural Network Model for Predicting Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time After Treatment With Heparin: Retrospective Study2022 · 4 citations
  3. 3A recurrent neural network model predicts activated partial thromboplastin time after treatment with heparin - a retrospective study (Preprint)2022
  4. 4Development and validation of a deep learning model to predict heparin response in critically ill patients with deep vein thrombosis receiving continuous intravenous heparin infusion2026
  5. 5Applying Machine Learning for Prescriptive Support: A Use Case with Unfractionated Heparin in Intensive Care Units2024 · 1 citations