The regulation of construction and building activities in the European Union remains characterized by considerable fragmentation, with each member state maintaining distinct building codes and regulatory systems. This divergence presents substantial obstacles to the functioning of the internal market, creates inefficiencies for businesses, and complicates the pursuit of sustainability and safety objectives. This paper provides a comprehensive assessment of the legal, political, economic, and technical challenges inherent in harmonizing building legislation across the EU. It critically evaluates national sovereignty issues, the subsidiarity principle, and resistance from industry stakeholders as key impediments. Moreover, it examines the economic costs and safety risks linked to regulatory fragmentation. Building upon this analysis, the paper proposes a hybrid harmonization model featuring EU-wide minimum standards complemented by national discretion. The role of digital tools, particularly Building Information Modelling, is discussed as a catalyst for integration. The study concludes that while complex, harmonization of building legislation is essential for enhancing the EU’s competitiveness, fostering sustainable construction practices, and supporting internal market cohesion.
Panayides et al. (Mon,) studied this question.