PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 26, 2026Rhetorica0 citations

The Daimonion of Isocrates: Anti-Socratic Polemics and the Power of Politikoi Logoi in the Philippos

View Full Paper
THTobias Hirsch

Key Points

  • The aim is to analyze how Isocrates transforms the Socratic daimonion into a divine power that justifies political action.
  • Literary analysis of Isocrates' Philippos
  • Examination of the conceptual shift in the daimonion's meaning
  • Exploration of the relationship between logos and praxis
  • Isocrates redefines the daimonion to support political legitimacy
  • Highlights the significance of audience-directed discourse in rhetoric
  • Demonstrates the potential of performative texts in guiding political action

Abstract

Abstract: This article argues that in his Philippos (Isoc. 5.149), Isocrates reinterprets the Socratic daimonion , transforming it from an inner ethical sign into a divine power legitimizing political action. Embedded in the speech's broader anti-Socratic polemic, this alteration aligns with Isocrates' conception of the politikos logos as a practical, audience-directed discourse. The daimonion passage thus exposes the philosophical foundations of Isocratean rhetoric: divine sanction for the interdependence of logos and praxis . By invoking a divine mandate that unites logos and praxis , Isocrates presents his logoi as performative texts capable of guiding Philip II of Macedon toward the common political good of Greece.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tobias Hirsch (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c4cdb6fdc3bde44891a68ahttps://doi.org/10.1353/rht.2026.a985668
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper