PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 26, 2026The Proceedings of Mechanical Engineering Congress Japan0 citationsOpen Access

Evaluation of AE waveform characteristics for various damage models in CFRP

View Full Paper
SUShunya UmemotoHCH. ChoMKMiyuki Kadokura

Key Points

  • This research aims to classify acoustic emission signals to identify various fracture types in CFRP materials effectively.
  • Classified AE signals using supervised machine learning techniques.
  • Extracted supervised signals for Mode I and Mode II delamination from DCB and SB tests.
  • Collected additional AE data from tensile and three-point bending tests.
  • Applied principal component analysis (PCA) to visualize AE signal distributions.
  • AE signals from DCB and SB tests formed distinct clusters.
  • Some AE signals overlapped with clusters from tensile and bending tests.
  • Excluding overlapping clusters enhances feature extraction for specific delamination modes.

Abstract

The goal of this study is to classify Acoustic Emission (AE) signals based on their characteristics into several fracture types. AE method allows us to classify the damage process of CFRP with machine learning. However, unsupervised learning was often applied for classification which required manually matching the resulting clusters to specific damage types. In contrast, supervised learning to AE signals can automatically determine the damage types. A supervised learning technique uses many AE signals corresponding to each damage mode (supervised signals) in advance. In this study, supervised signals for Mode I and Mode II delamination were extracted from AE signals generated during Double Cantilever Beam (DCB) and Short Beam (SB) tests, respectively. While these delamination modes are dominant in each test, AE signals from other damage types, such as matrix cracking and fiber breakage, are also present. To account for this, additional AE data were obtained from tensile and three-point bending tests, where such damage is dominant. Finally, principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to visualize the distribution of AE signals. The results showed that AE signals from DCB and SB formed distinct clusters, while some overlapped with clusters from tensile and three-point bending signals. This suggests that by excluding overlapping clusters, it is possible to extract features that are more specific to Mode I and Mode II delamination.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Umemoto et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c4cdb6fdc3bde44891a690https://doi.org/10.1299/jsmemecj.2025.j041p-18
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Classification and Parameter Selection for Damage Characterization in CFRP Composite Materials Using Acoustic Emission and Multivariate Statistics2026
  2. 2A Comprehensive Analysis of Acoustic Emission Signals to Distinguish the Different Damage Types for Fiber‐Reinforced Polymers: A Review2025
  3. 3Characterization of the damage mechanism in CFRP composites under mode I based on comprehensive analysis of AE signals2024 · 7 citations
  4. 4Detectability of Damages in Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastics using Acoustic Emission2025
  5. 5Damage Mode Identification in <scp>2D</scp> Triaxial Carbon Fiber Braided Composites via Acoustic Emission Segmentation and Variational Mode Decomposition Optimization2025