PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 27, 2026Bulletin of the National Research Centre/Bulletin of the National Research Center0 citationsOpen Access

Artificial intelligence in orthopaedic research: a bibliometric analysis of publication trends in high-impact journals (2016–2024)

EÖEkrem ÖzdemirNANasuhi Altay

Key Points

  • This research aims to quantify the integration and publication trends of artificial intelligence in orthopaedic studies over the last decade.
  • Conducted bibliometric analysis of publications from 2016 to 2024 in ten high-impact orthopaedic journals.
  • Categorized AI publications into pre-emergence and post-emergence periods based on AI adoption.
  • Applied time-series analysis and polynomial regression modeling to assess publication trends.
  • Identified thematic shifts using Latent Dirichlet Allocation modeling.
  • Total orthopaedic publications rose from 1,487 in 2016 to 2,089 in 2024.
  • AI-related content increased from 0.7% to 9.8% of total publications (p < 0.001).
  • Machine learning applications grew 15-fold, while deep learning studies increased 12-fold post-2022.
  • Convolutional neural networks were the most reported AI methodology (38% of AI studies).

Abstract

This bibliometric study quantified the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into orthopaedic research by analyzing publication trends and thematic evolution in high-impact journals over the past decade. We systematically analyzed articles published between 2016 and 2024 in ten leading orthopaedic journals (SCI Q1) using Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus databases. Publications were categorized into pre-emergence (2016–2022) and post-emergence (2023–2024) periods based on AI adoption patterns, with the temporal boundary informed by documented ChatGPT release timing and the observed inflection point in AI-related publication volume. AI-related articles were identified through validated keyword searches of titles and abstracts. Publication trends were assessed using time-series analysis including third-order polynomial regression modeling, while Latent Dirichlet Allocation modeling identified thematic shifts. Specific AI methodologies (e.g., convolutional neural networks, random forests, support vector machines) were classified where reported. Statistical significance was determined using chi-square and trend analyses. Total publications increased from 1,487 (2016) to 2,089 (2024), with AI-related content rising from 0.7% to 9.8% (p < 0.001); polynomial regression confirmed an exponential growth pattern (R² = 0.98). Machine learning applications showed 15-fold growth, while deep learning studies increased 12-fold post-2022. Among methodologically specified AI studies (n = 412), convolutional neural networks were most prevalent (38%), followed by random forests (22%), support vector machines (15%), and gradient boosting methods (12%). Topic modeling revealed the emergence of AI-driven themes, including automated diagnostic imaging (14% of AI studies), predictive analytics (12%), and surgical navigation systems (8%). Traditional research domains largely maintained their absolute volume but decreased proportionally due to diversification into AI-related topics. Clinical implementation studies comprised approximately 60% of recent AI publications, suggesting a shift from primarily methodological work toward more application-focused research. AI appears to be increasingly shaping orthopaedic research, contributing to both quantitative growth and qualitative thematic shifts in premier journals. The observed transition from methodological development to clinically oriented studies indicates that AI integration is becoming a recurrent component of orthopaedic research practice. These findings suggest that orthopaedic professionals may benefit from developing AI literacy to keep pace with evolving research paradigms and emerging clinical applications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Özdemir et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c61ff615a0a509bde18504https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-026-01426-7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper