PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 27, 2026The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal0 citations

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Resorption Rates of Mandibular Cortical and Iliac Cancellous Bone Grafts in Alveolar Cleft Repair

View Full Paper
XPXuefei PangXZXia ZhaoZYZuYin YU

Key Points

  • The study aimed to compare the osteogenic effects and bone resorption rates of mandibular cortex bone and iliac cancellous bone in alveolar cleft repair.
  • Randomized controlled trial design
  • Patients with unilateral alveolar cleft were allocated to receive either MCB or ICB grafting
  • Clinical and radiographic examinations performed at multiple time points post-surgery
  • Bone resorption rates measured at 6 months postoperatively
  • The MCB group exhibited a significantly lower bone resorption rate (45.20%) compared to the ICB group (74.87%)
  • Two adverse events were reported in the MCB group
  • Higher costs associated with the MCB group (P < 0.001)
  • Shorter length of hospital stay in the MCB group (P < 0.001)
  • Longer surgery duration in the MCB group (P = 0.026)

Abstract

Objective The main objective of the randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to evaluate the short-term osteogenic effects of mandibular cortex bone (MCB) versus iliac cancellous bone (ICB) after secondary alveolar bone graft. Design RCT. Setting Department of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery in the Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital from September 1, 2020, to August 31, 2023. Patients Patients with unilateral alveolar cleft. Interventions Those who met the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to receive either MCB or ICB grafting. Clinical and radiographic examinations were performed preoperatively and immediately, as well as at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively. Main Outcome Measure(s) The bone resorption rate was measured 6 months postoperatively. Clinical observations included adverse events and hospitalization details including length of surgery, intraoperative bleeding, length of stay, and costs. Results A total of 28 patients were included, with 16 allocated to the MCB group and 12 to the ICB group. The bone resorption rate in the MCB group (45.20 ± 29.81%) was significantly lower than that in the ICB group (74.87 ± 18.48%) (P = 0.005). Two adverse events were reported in the MCB group. The MCB group had significantly greater costs (P < 0.001), a significantly shorter length of stay (P < 0.001), and a significantly longer duration of surgery (P = 0.026). However, there were no significant differences in terms of intraoperative bleeding. Conclusion Compared with ICB, MCB demonstrated a slower bone resorption rate in the short term for treating secondary alveolar cleft in this study, albeit with increased surgical time and costs. Trial Registration Registry number: ChiCTR2000034227 URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojEN.html?proj=55737 .

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c61ff615a0a509bde18537https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656261432505
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper