PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 27, 2026Brain Informatics0 citationsOpen Access

U-Net-based transfer learning for automated tumour segmentation enabling fully automated 18FF-DOPA PET analysis in paediatric gliomas

View Full Paper
MMMichele MuredduRTRosella TròFGFederico Giovanni Garau

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess the feasibility of using a deep learning model for fully automated tumour segmentation and parameter extraction in paediatric gliomas.
  • Evaluated a deep learning model based on transfer learning from adult glioma datasets.
  • Used [18F]F-DOPA PET scans from 103 paediatric patients for fine-tuning.
  • Compared automatic, semi-automatic, and manual tumour delineation approaches.
  • The best model achieved a Dice score of 0.82 ± 0.11.
  • High reproducibility of the Automatic Tumour-to-Striatum ratio across comparison methods (p > 0.05).
  • Significant differences in Tumour-to-Background ratios with manual delineations (p < 0.01).
  • Automated static indices correlated significantly with tumour grade and survival outcomes (p < 0.05).

Abstract

PET imaging with 18FF-DOPA shows great promise for assessing paediatric gliomas. Manual tumour delineation and parameter extraction are time-consuming and prone to inter-operator variability. We evaluated whether a deep learning model, leveraging transfer learning from adult glioma datasets, could enable a fully automated pipeline for tumour segmentation and PET parameter extraction. Static and dynamic parameters were compared across three approaches: (i) automatic vs semi-automatic, (ii) automatic vs manual, and (iii) manual vs. semi-automatic. Data from 103 paediatric patients (median age 11 years; 54 females, 49 males) with static and/or dynamic 18FF-DOPA PET scans (2011–2024) were retrospectively included for fine-tuning the deep learning model. Statistical and survival analyses were performed on 90 subjects; dynamic analysis included 32 patients. The best model achieved a Dice score of 0.82 ± 0.11 and was integrated into the pipeline for extracting static and dynamic indices. Automatic Tumour-to-Striatum ratio showed high reproducibility across comparisons ((i) p = 0.660, (ii) p = 0.342, (iii) p = 0.639), while Tumour-to-Background differed significantly when comparing manual delineations (p 0.05). Importantly, both automated static indices correlate significantly with tumour grade, with the overall and progression-free survival (p < 0.05). Transfer learning enabled a fully automatic 18FF-DOPA PET pipeline for paediatric gliomas, providing reproducible static and dynamic parameter extraction and correlating with clinically relevant outcomes. This approach reduces operator dependence and streamlines analysis, supporting potential integration into routine clinical practice.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mureddu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c61ff615a0a509bde18568https://doi.org/10.1186/s40708-026-00296-z
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1AAPM task group report 273: Recommendations on best practices for AI and machine learning for computer‐aided diagnosis in medical imaging2022 · 97 citations
  2. 2Intraobserver and Interobserver Agreement in Volumetric Assessment of Glioblastoma Multiforme Resection2010 · 64 citations
  3. 3Supratentorial High-Grade Astrocytoma and Diffuse Brainstem Glioma: Two Challenges for the Pediatric Oncologist2004 · 224 citations
  4. 4Optimized U-Net for Brain Tumor Segmentation2021 · 9 citations
  5. 5From pixels to insights: Machine learning and deep learning for bioimage analysis2023 · 31 citations