PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 27, 2026Electronics0 citationsOpen Access

Experimental Analysis of LiDAR Distance Measurement Errors Induced by Platform Vibration

View Full Paper
JMJunghwan MoonSLS.H. Lee

Key Points

  • The central aim is to investigate how platform vibration affects the accuracy of LiDAR distance measurements.
  • Experimental analysis of LiDAR under varying platform vibrations
  • Measurement of distance errors at fixed horizontal distance of 1.5 m
  • Statistical evaluation using two-way ANOVA and error metrics
  • Mean error remained at the 10−5 m level across vibration stages indicating negligible bias
  • Interquartile range increased approximately threefold from Baseline to S3
  • Total error range expanded by roughly 4–11 times under vibration
  • Outlier ratio increased by about 1.5–2 times in high-vibration conditions
  • Variance and root mean square error exhibited nonlinear growth with vibration intensity

Abstract

This paper experimentally analyzes how stepwise platform vibration (Baseline-S3, approximately 0.3–0.6 mm amplitude) alters the statistical structure of distance measurement errors in a dual-channel LIght Detection And Ranging (LiDAR) (0° and −3°) at a fixed horizontal distance of 1.5 m. The mean error remained at the 10−5 m level across all vibration stages, indicating negligible systematic bias. However, distribution-based metrics showed substantial amplification. The interquartile range (IQR) increased by approximately threefold from Baseline to S3, while the total error range expanded by roughly 4–11 times. The outlier ratio increased by about 1.5–2 times under high-vibration conditions. Both variance and root mean square error (RMSE) exhibited nonlinear growth with increasing vibration intensity. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed no statistically significant differences at the mean level (p>0.05), whereas variability-based indicators consistently demonstrated dispersion amplification. These findings indicate that LiDAR degradation under vibration is governed primarily by stochastic dispersion expansion and extreme-value behavior rather than systematic bias shift.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Moon et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c6202f15a0a509bde188cdhttps://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15071357
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evaluating the Performance of Pulsed and Continuous-Wave Lidar Wind Profilers with a Controlled Motion Experiment2024 · 2 citations
  2. 2Experimental Evaluation of the Motion-Induced Effects for Turbulent Fluctuations Measurement on Floating Lidar Systems2024 · 3 citations
  3. 3Point-based, profile-based and 3D point cloud-based vibration monitoring of structures: comparisons based on a lab experiment2026
  4. 4Analysis of the measurement uncertainty for a 3D wind-LiDAR2024 · 3 citations
  5. 5Measurement Accuracy and Attitude Compensation of Rayleigh Lidar on an Airborne Floating Platform2024 · 1 citations