This paper experimentally analyzes how stepwise platform vibration (Baseline-S3, approximately 0.3–0.6 mm amplitude) alters the statistical structure of distance measurement errors in a dual-channel LIght Detection And Ranging (LiDAR) (0° and −3°) at a fixed horizontal distance of 1.5 m. The mean error remained at the 10−5 m level across all vibration stages, indicating negligible systematic bias. However, distribution-based metrics showed substantial amplification. The interquartile range (IQR) increased by approximately threefold from Baseline to S3, while the total error range expanded by roughly 4–11 times. The outlier ratio increased by about 1.5–2 times under high-vibration conditions. Both variance and root mean square error (RMSE) exhibited nonlinear growth with increasing vibration intensity. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed no statistically significant differences at the mean level (p>0.05), whereas variability-based indicators consistently demonstrated dispersion amplification. These findings indicate that LiDAR degradation under vibration is governed primarily by stochastic dispersion expansion and extreme-value behavior rather than systematic bias shift.
Moon et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: