PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 27, 2026The Plant Journal1 citationsOpen Access

Features affecting Cas9‐induced editing efficiency and patterns in tomato: evidence from a large CRISPR dataset

View Full Paper
ACAmit CucuyDBDaniela Ben‐TovCMCathy Melamed‐Bessudo

Key Points

  • The research aims to understand the factors influencing Cas9 editing efficiency and repair outcomes in tomato plants.
  • Generated a dataset with 420 sgRNAs targeting various gene regions in tomato protoplasts
  • Quantified editing efficiency, chromatin accessibility, and transcriptional state
  • Analyzed patterns of DNA double-strand break repair
  • Higher editing efficiency observed at chromatin-accessible targets compared to less accessible regions
  • Promoters and introns exhibited modestly higher efficiency than exons
  • Certain sgRNAs achieved near-complete editing and distinctive repair footprints indicative of MMEJ
  • Human-trained prediction models inadequately ranked sgRNA performance in plants

Abstract

SUMMARY CRISPR/Cas9 is a cornerstone of plant genome editing, yet the determinants of editing efficiency for a given single‐guide RNAs (sgRNAs) and DNA double‐strand break (DSB) repair outcomes remain poorly understood, particularly in plants. Here, we generated a large experimental dataset comprising 420 sgRNAs targeting promoters, exons, and introns of 137 genes in tomato protoplasts, and quantified editing efficiency and repair footprints together with chromatin accessibility and transcriptional state in the same cellular context. Editing efficiency was consistently higher at targets in accessible chromatin and modestly higher in promoters and introns than in exons, whereas transcriptional activity had no detectable effect. Editing efficiencies were more similar among sgRNAs targeting the same gene than among different genes, revealing a local genomic influence on Cas9 activity. A distinct subset of sgRNAs achieved near‐complete editing and produced characteristic repair footprints dominated by long deletions with extended microhomology tracts, indicative of microhomology‐mediated end joining (MMEJ), resembling patterns associated with high‐efficiency guides in human cells, and suggesting conserved sequence‐driven repair biases across species. In contrast, widely used human‐trained prediction models failed to accurately rank sgRNA performance in plants, highlighting the limits of cross‐species predictability. Together, this dataset provides a resource for improving guide design and mechanistic understanding of plant DNA repair.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cucuy et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c620be15a0a509bde195dahttps://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.70809
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Comparison of Cas12a and Cas9-mediated mutagenesis in tomato cells2024 · 8 citations
  2. 2Redirecting DNA repair for efficient CRISPR-Cas-based gene targeting in tomato2024
  3. 3Current Trends in CRISPR‐Cas System Based Genome Editing in Tomato (<scp><i>Solanum lycopersicum</i></scp>)2025 · 2 citations
  4. 4A quantitative assay for the efficiency of <scp>RNA</scp>‐guided genome editing in plants2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5Optimized protoplast isolation and transfection with a breakpoint: accelerating Cas9/sgRNA cleavage efficiency validation in monocot and dicot2024 · 44 citations