Metaverse Autopsy is a constitutional diagnosis of why the metaverse failed, why Horizon Worlds never became a genuine spatial computing environment, and why Meta spent 83. 6 billion building the wrong thing. The document argues that the failure was not caused by hardware, content, pricing, or timing, but by the absence of a complete spatial computing design language — a foundational system of vocabulary, grammar, laws, and constitutional structure required for any spatial environment to succeed. In this sense, it is not a product review or a critique of virtual reality, but a metaverse autopsy: a diagnosis of failure and a solution framework for spatial computing, embodied interfaces, human sovereignty, and enterprise spatial computing. The work distinguishes the metaverse from spatial computing with precision. The metaverse is described as a surveillance-advertising architecture transplanted into three-dimensional hardware and renamed, while spatial computing is defined as a medium with constitutional requirements in which every environment must obey architecturally enforced laws rather than optional guidelines. The document establishes spatial truth as a core principle, where spatial arrangement must communicate meaning faithfully; treats ethics as architectural substrate rather than policy overlay; and frames AI governance in spatial environments as necessarily bounded, verifiable, and intrinsic to system design. As such, the publication is directly relevant to design language research, regulatory compliance, spatial web architecture, cognitive accessibility, and the broader analysis of why the metaverse failed. The diagnosis is developed through twelve constitutional laws of DmetriX: the Sovereignty Law, Inheritance Law, Spatial Truth Law, Singular Purpose Law, Continuous Service Law, Eloquence of Absence Law, Motion Semantics Law, Hierarchy of Intelligence Law, Trust Accumulation Law, Traveler Law, Grammar Clarity Law, and Ethical Foundation Law. The text uses the legless avatar, the simulated legs demonstration, the Personal Boundary patch, platform comparisons, low world visitation rates, early trust collapse, and the accumulation of Reality Labs losses as evidence that Horizon Worlds was structurally incapable of delivering spatial fluency, safe embodied presence, durable community, or sustained trust. The conclusion is explicit: the metaverse did not merely underperform; it was constitutionally incompatible with the medium it claimed to represent. The solution presented is the DmetriX Spatial Design System, described as a complete constitutional framework for spatial computing. It defines what spatial environments are, how they behave, what humans are entitled to within them, how intelligent agents operate under constraint, and what conditions are required for genuine compliance across platforms and the spatial web. The publication establishes itself as a standalone work — Metaverse Autopsy: Diagnosis of Why the Metaverse Failed and Its Solution — rather than as part of The Spatial World series, while sharing the same underlying constitutional framework. Author: Ibrahim Abdul-Rahman Adebola| DmetriX — Doctor of MetricsLicense: CC BY-NC-ND 4. 0Contact: dmetrixcraft@proton. meSeries notifications: Get Notified
Abdul-Rahman Adebola Ibrahim (Thu,) studied this question.