PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 28, 2026Vaccines0 citationsOpen Access

Intranasal Vaccine Adjuvants and Delivery Platforms: From Barrier Mechanisms to Clinical Translation

View Full Paper
SYShunyu YaoZZZhe ZhaiLLLiqi Liao

Key Points

  • To identify mechanisms and evaluate challenges in using intranasal vaccine adjuvants for respiratory diseases.
  • Conducted a systematic review of 127 articles from PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase (2010–2026)
  • Categorized adjuvant types and their mechanisms of action
  • Analyzed mucosal barrier mechanisms and challenges in intranasal delivery
  • Identified key bottlenecks such as insufficient mucosal targeting and inconsistent safety evaluation standards
  • Emphasized the role of adjuvants in enhancing mucosal immune responses
  • Highlighted future directions including biomimetic and thermally stable adjuvants

Abstract

As a non-invasive mucosal immunization strategy, intranasal vaccines are highly promising for preventing respiratory infectious diseases. Among them, recombinant subunit vaccines represent a safe and ideal option, as they induce targeted mucosal immunity without the safety risks associated with live-vectored or nucleic acid vaccines. However, nasal mucosal defenses rapidly clear antigens before immune activation, limiting protective efficacy. Therefore, intranasal vaccine adjuvants—key regulators of immune response intensity, duration, and type—are essential to overcome mucosal tolerance and improve immunogenicity. Based on a systematic search and analysis of 127 peer-reviewed articles (2010–2026) in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase, this study comprehensively summarizes the mechanisms, applications, and limitations of existing and candidate adjuvants for intranasal vaccines. This review systematically categorizes and discusses the nasal mucosal barrier, major adjuvant types (e.g., pattern recognition receptor agonists, cytokine adjuvants, and carrier adjuvants), and their mechanisms of action. It also identifies key bottlenecks: insufficient mucosal targeting, inconsistent global safety evaluation standards for adjuvants, and interference from pre-existing antibodies in humans. Furthermore, this review highlights future development directions, including biomimetic adjuvants, pH-responsive nanoadjuvants, and thermostable vaccine formulations. This systematic review clarifies key scientific and technical barriers in intranasal vaccine adjuvant development. The findings provide valuable references for advancing the translation of intranasal vaccines from emergency countermeasures to routine, accessible preventive tools for respiratory infectious diseases.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yao et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c771518bbfbc51511e1411https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines14040295
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper