Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic utility of the hemoglobin–albumin–lymphocyte–platelet (HALP) score and several systemic inflammatory indices derived from routine blood parameters—including the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), pan-immune inflammation value (PIV), and systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI)—for pathogen differentiation and clinical assessment in culture-proven late-onset neonatal sepsis (LOS). Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of 150 neonates with culture-proven LOS. Systemic inflammatory indices were calculated at baseline (first week of life) and at the time of septic insult. The discriminative power of these indices was assessed via ROC curve analysis, with optimal cut-off points determined by the Youden Index. Risk stratification was performed using Odds Ratio (OR) modeling with 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) to evaluate the predictive strength of each marker according to its respective threshold. Results: Diagnosis-phase assessments identified SII as the premier discriminator for microbiological etiology (AUC = 0.869; OR = 44.57), outperforming PLR and PIV. Although HALP demonstrated moderate efficacy in distinguishing pathogens, it lacked prognostic value regarding mortality. Conversely, SIRI displayed limited clinical utility, yielding the lowest predictive performance in our cohort. Conclusions: In neonatal sepsis, the HALP score provided additional clinical information when compared with several hematological inflammatory indices. Although HALP was not associated with mortality, prospective multicenter studies are needed to clarify the role of these cost-effective markers in pathogen differentiation and clinical assessment of LOS.
Bozkaya et al. (2026) studied this question.