PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 28, 2026International Journal of Information and Communication Technology0 citationsOpen Access

Correlation between course grades and evaluation grades based on Fruchterman-Reingold and Theil-Sen

YKYingli Kong

Key Points

  • The aim is to model and enhance the correlation between course grades and evaluation grades using advanced analytical techniques.
  • Developed an integrated model combining Fruchterman-Reingold and Theil-Sen methods.
  • Constructed a dual-module architecture for community identification and group regression analysis.
  • Implemented a closed-loop system for feedback optimization of analytical processes.
  • Achieved a convergence efficiency of 0.77% per iteration.
  • Demonstrated outlier robustness with a score of 0.89.
  • Identified group differences with an accuracy of 0.94.

Abstract

To address issues such as fuzzy topological structures, overlooked group differences, and the disconnect between visualisation and quantitative analysis in course grade-teaching evaluation correlation studies, this study proposes an integrated model based on Fruchterman-Reingold and Theil-Sen.Its core innovation lies in constructing a dual-module collaborative architecture: enhancing course community identification through spectrum-guided layout optimisation, and employing topology-featureweighted group regression that integrates topological stability indices with subgroup trend medians to precisely characterise heterogeneous group associations.It implements a closed-loop analytical paradigm of 'topological feature extraction group difference modelling feedback optimisation', overcoming the limitations of linear processes that separate network layout from regression validation.Experimental results demonstrate a convergence efficiency of 0.77%/iteration, outlier robustness of 0.89, and processing time of 87.2 ms.The model achieved a correlation estimation bias of 0.10, group difference identification accuracy of 0.94, and cross-discipline generalisation error of 0.10.In loosely structured course groups, performance declined notably.This model significantly enhances the analytical capability for curriculum interrelationships and improves the accuracy of cross-group correlation estimation in educational assessment, providing reliable technical support for dynamic monitoring of teaching quality and optimisation of interdisciplinary curriculum systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yingli Kong (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c771988bbfbc51511e1a18https://doi.org/10.1504/ijict.2026.152533
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper