PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología0 citationsOpen Access

Anti-HPV gel versus interferon α-2b gel as adjuvant therapy after LEEP for HSIL with HR-HPV infection on clinical outcomes, vaginal microecology, and biomarkers of proliferation and immunity

XLXu LongMLMengjun LuoCYChunrong Yang

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of Anti-HPV gel versus Interferon α-2b gel as adjuvant therapies after LEEP in HSIL patients.
  • Retrospective cohort study involving 207 patients diagnosed with HSIL and HR-HPV infection.
  • Patients were divided into two groups: control (Interferon α-2b gel) and observation (Anti-HPV gel).
  • Both groups received two standardized treatment courses post-operatively.
  • Outcome measures included clinical effective rate, vaginal microecological recovery, serum inflammatory cytokines, immunoglobulins, and cell proliferation markers.
  • Observation group had a higher clinical effective rate (87.62% vs. 75.49%, P = 0.024).
  • Better vaginal microecology in the observation group with lower post-treatment pH and Nugent scores (both P < 0.001).
  • Greater reductions in inflammatory markers and increases in immunoglobulins in the observation group (all P < 0.001).
  • Lower HR-HPV recurrence rate in the observation group (6.67% vs. 16.67%, P = 0.024) with comparable adverse event rates.

Abstract

Objective To evaluate and compare the efficacy, impact on vaginal microbiota, changes in inflammatory/immune/proliferation biomarkers, and safety profile of Anti-HPV gel versus Interferon α-2b gel as adjuvant therapies after LEEP in patients with HSIL and HR-HPV infection. Methods This retrospective cohort study included 207 eligible patients diagnosed with HSIL and HR-HPV infection who underwent initial LEEP between January 2023 and January 2025. Patients were divided into a control group (n=102, Interferon α-2b gel) and an observation group (n=105, Anti-HPV gel), both receiving two standardized treatment courses post-operatively. Outcome measures included total clinical effective rate, vaginal microecological recovery (pH, Nugent score), serum inflammatory cytokines (IL-17, TNF-α, IFN-γ, TGF-β), immunoglobulins (IgA, IgG, IgM), cell proliferation markers (serum Survivin, cervical tissue Ki-67), adverse events, and 6-month HR-HPV recurrence rate. An exploratory model was constructed using post-treatment indicators to predict recurrence. Results Compared with the control group, the observation group showed superior outcomes across multiple domains: a higher total clinical effective rate (87.62% vs. 75.49%, P = 0.024); better restoration of vaginal microecology with lower post-treatment pH (4.29 ± 0.37 vs. 4.78 ± 0.42, P0.001) and Nugent score (2.96 ± 1.15 vs. 4.52 ± 1.37, P0.001); greater reductions in serum inflammatory markers (IL-17, TNF-α, IFN-γ, TGF-β, all P0.001); greater increases in immunoglobulins (IgA, IgG, IgM, all P0.001); more pronounced decreases in cell proliferation markers (serum Survivin and tissue Ki-67, both P0.001); a lower 6-month HR-HPV recurrence rate (6.67% vs. 16.67%, P = 0.024) with comparable overall adverse event incidence (10.48% vs. 13.73%, P = 0.473). The exploratory predictive model based on post-treatment indicators demonstrated good discrimination for recurrence (AUC = 0.812, 95% CI: 0.747–0.878). Conclusion In conclusion, as a postoperative adjuvant, Anti-HPV gel demonstrated superior clinical and biomarker outcomes compared to Interferon α-2b gel, with a favorable safety profile and lower short-term recurrence risk, suggesting its promising clinical value pending prospective confirmation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Long et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c115de0f0f753b39b9f8https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2026.1784137
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1IFN-γ and TGF-β, Crucial Players in Immune Responses: A Tribute to Howard Young2022 · 43 citations
  2. 2Relationship between vaginal microecological changes and oncogene E6/E7 and high-risk human papillomavirus infection2023 · 14 citations
  3. 3The Role of p16/Ki-67 Immunostaining, hTERC Amplification and Fibronectin in Predicting Cervical Cancer Progression: A Systematic Review2022 · 23 citations
  4. 4A randomized open-label clinical trial of an anti-HPV biological dressing (JB01-BD) administered intravaginally to treat high-risk HPV infection2015 · 25 citations
  5. 5The role of immune cells and inflammasomes in Modulating cytokine responses in HPV-Related cervical cancer2024 · 16 citations