PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 2026Baghdad Science Journal0 citationsOpen Access

Leveraging Feature Fusion and Convolutional Neural Networks for Concrete Crack Prediction

View Full Paper
AMAmal Abdulbaqi MaryooshSPSaeid PashazadehPSPedram Salehpour

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop a hybrid method for detecting concrete cracks by improving classification accuracy.
  • Utilized Local Binary Patterns (LBP) to extract texture features.
  • Employed a pre-trained Xception model for semantic feature extraction.
  • Applied Bag of Visual Words (BoVW) method for feature conversion and fusion.
  • Implemented the light MobileNetV3 for classification.
  • Tested the model on four public datasets using 10-fold cross-validation.
  • Achieved an error rate of less than 1%.
  • Recorded classification accuracy scores of 0.9995, 0.9983, 0.9998, and 0.9993 across datasets.
  • Achieved precision values of 0.9998, 1.0000, 1.0000, and 0.9991.
  • Reported recall figures of 0.9995, 0.9938, 0.9998, and 0.9986.

Abstract

Detection of cracks in concrete is crucial for the safety of bridges and the overall infrastructure. This paper presents a new hybrid method that combines handcrafted and deep features to significantly improve classification accuracy. Texture and semantic information are captured using Local Binary Patterns (LBP) and a pre-trained Xception model, respectively. These features are converted by the Bag of Visual Words (BoVW) method, combined, and the best features are selected by using the Apriori algorithm. The selected features are classified utilizing the light MobileNetV3, a large network. Our method is tested on four public datasets, namely CODEBRIM, DIMEC, Crack, BCD, and Bridge, using 10, fold cross, validation. The model we introduced has drastically diminished the error rate by less than 1%. Furthermore, it performed well on the accuracy metric, achieving scores of 0.9995, 0.9983, 0.9998, and 0.9993, respectively. Precision values reached 0.9998, 1.0000, 1.0000, and 0.9991, while recall figures stood at 0.9995, 0.9938, 0.9998, and 0.9986 for these same datasets. Compared to other deep learning models trained on the same datasets, our model shows highly encouraging and promising outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Maryoosh et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c15ade0f0f753b39bc26https://doi.org/10.21123/2411-7986.5253
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper