PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 2026British journal of surgery0 citations

SRS183 - Calcium channel blockers and bone aealth: a systematic review of preclinical and clinical evidence

View Full Paper
NKNakulan Nantha KumarNBNagavaishnavi Venkata BhaskaraKKKapil Kumar

Key Points

  • This review aims to evaluate the effects of calcium channel blockers on bone health, specifically focusing on bone mineral density and fracture risk.
  • Conducted a systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase for preclinical and clinical studies related to calcium channel blockers and bone health.
  • Included studies reporting on fracture risk and various parameters of bone metabolism.
  • Assessed risk of bias using established tools and performed a narrative synthesis of included studies.
  • 34 studies were included, equally split between preclinical and clinical research.
  • Clinical studies showed inconsistent effects: 4 reported reduced bone mineral density, while fracture risk varied by 4 studies each of increased, decreased, and unchanged risk.
  • Preclinical findings indicated mixed results regarding bone metabolic markers, with some studies showing lower levels of markers like CTX and PINP.

Abstract

Abstract Background Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are widely prescribed for older adults at risk of osteoporotic fractures. Despite preclinical data suggesting CCB-mediated effects on bone remodelling, clinical findings on bone mineral density (BMD) risk of bias was assessed with appropriate tools (SYRCLE, RoB 2, ROBINS-I). A narrative synthesis was performed. Results 34 studies were included (17 preclinical; 17 clinical). Among clinical studies, 4/17 reported reduced BMD with CCBs; fracture risk increased in 4, decreased in 4, 1 study additionally reported a protective association with osteoporosis. Preclinical findings across 655 animals were mixed for BMD, calcium, PTH, ALP, these mechanisms remain hypothesis-generating. Standardised preclinical endpoints & large, well-adjusted prospective cohorts stratified by dihydropyridine versus non-dihydropyridine agents, dose, & duration are needed to clarify skeletal effects.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kumar et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c247de0f0f753b39c848https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znag018.174
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper