PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 2026British journal of surgery0 citations

SRS313 - Negative pressure wound therapy in free flap reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

View Full Paper
KKKazuho KawashimaAEAli Esmaeli

Key Points

  • This review aims to assess the effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy compared to conventional wound therapy in free flap reconstruction post-operatively.
  • Conducted systematic searches in databases like CENTRAL, Medline, and Embase.
  • Included all prospective and retrospective studies on immediate post-operative NPWT application after free flap reconstruction.
  • Only English language publications were considered for analysis.
  • NPWT significantly reduced overall complication rates compared to conventional wound therapy.
  • Statistically significant reduction in flap size was observed with NPWT.
  • No significant difference in flap survival rates was found between NPWT and conventional wound therapy.

Abstract

Abstract Background Despite extensive research on negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), its impact on immediate post-operative application in free flap reconstruction remains underexplored. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy of NPWT compared to conventional wound therapy (CWT) in post-operative management of free flap, focusing on flap survival, complication rates, and flap size. Methods Searches were carried out in CENTRAL, Medline, and Embase. All prospective or retrospective clinical studies examining the effect of immediate post-operative application of NPWT after free flap reconstruction were considered for the review. No restrictions were placed on the date of publication but only papers written in English were included. Results 13 studies were included in the review, with 6 studies eligible for the meta-analysis. A total of 321 free flaps were included in the pooled analysis. NPWT reduced overall complication rates compared to CWT (OR 0.34, 95% c.i. 0.13 to 0.88, P = 0.03, n = 240) and also resulted in a statistically significant reduction in flap size (SMD −1.54, 95% c.i. −2.48 to −0.54, P = 0.002, n = 43). However, there was no significant difference in flap survival rates (OR 2.34, 95% c.i. 0.77 to 7.09, P = 0.13, n = 252). Conclusions NPWT appears to offer benefits over CWT in reducing complications and flap size, but precautions should be taken in interpreting these results. Further high-quality randomised controlled trials are required to validate these findings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kawashima et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c25dde0f0f753b39ca52https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znag018.285
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Free Flap Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis2025
  2. 2Negative Pressure Wound Therapy as a Bridge to Definitive Reconstruction in Complex Extremity Trauma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis2026
  3. 3Efficacy and Safety of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Managing Lower Limb Amputation; An Updated Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis With Individual Patients Data Meta‐Analysis and <scp>GRADE</scp> Assessment2026
  4. 4SRS384 - Negative pressure wound therapy in patients undergoing open thoracic and abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials2026
  5. 5The Use of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy as an Adjunct Treatment in Patients Undergoing Sternal Wound Reconstruction With Pectoralis Major Flaps2026