Background: Breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM) lack effective treatments, contributing to breast cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Integrating translational animal models and advanced non-invasive imaging can accelerate the development of urgently needed therapies. Method: In this study, we developed an intracarotid method mimicking BCBM and compared it to the stereotactic model in terms of animal welfare, tumour establishment, and blood–brain barrier (BBB) permeability. BCBM was established through intracarotid or stereotactic inoculation of BT474 and MDA-MB-231.Luc2 cells in NMRI nude mice. We utilised magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and bioluminescence imaging (BLI) to monitor tumour growth and BBB permeability, supported by fluorescent immunohistochemistry for validation. Finally, light sheet microscopy (LSM) was employed to visualise tumour establishment in intact brains. Results: Both inoculation methods achieved a survival rate >70%, with animals recovering within a week post-surgery. MRI and BLI effectively visualised tumour growth with stereotactic implantation, resulting in single tumours, while intracarotid inoculation led to micro-seeding of up to seven tumours in one brain. Tumour growth was rapid and homogenous in the stereotactic model, whereas the intracarotid model exhibited slower, heterogenous growth. Notably, BBB permeability was significantly higher in small tumours in the stereotactic model when compared to the intracarotid model (p = 0.003). Ex vivo analyses validated these findings with the identification of multiple metastasis in the intracarotid model and single tumours in the stereotactic model. Conclusion: We developed an animal model that closely mimics BCBM, highlighting extravasation and micro-seeding while maintaining animal welfare. Our established imaging protocols enable longitudinal evaluations of BBB permeability and treatment response, creating a translational platform for testing novel anti-cancer therapies.
Cold et al. (2026) studied this question.