PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 2026British journal of surgery0 citations

SRS373 - Use of artificial intelligence in surgical care in low- and middle-income countries

View Full Paper
AVAlessandro ValliSTSamuel James TingleSKSofia Kazerouni

Key Points

  • This review examines the presence and progress of artificial intelligence research in surgical care within low- and middle-income countries.
  • Conducted a scoping review according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines.
  • Searched databases like PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for relevant studies.
  • Included primary studies evaluating AI in surgical care specific to LMICs.
  • Out of 2602 records, 474 studies qualified for inclusion.
  • 64.6% of studies were from China, with minimal contributions from lower-income countries.
  • The majority focused on algorithm development and internal validation, with only a small number advancing to clinical deployment.

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Artificial intelligence (AI) has been proposed as a tool to expand access to medical care. The extent to which surgical AI research addresses the needs of low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remains unclear. This scoping review synthesises primary research to assess where studies are being conducted and how far they progress towards clinical implementation. Methods A registered scoping review was performed in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines (OSF.IO/9PV6A). PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched to 14/07/2025. Primary studies evaluating AI in LMIC surgical care were included. Extracted data were analysed to describe geographical distribution and the maturity of AI development, mapped to the OECD framework. Results From 2602 records, 474 studies met inclusion. Research was highly uneven with 64.6% of studies originating from China (n = 306). Only 9.5% (n = 45) originated from lower-middle income countries and 0.8% (n = 4) from low-income countries. Minimal evidence originated from Sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America. The evidence base was dominated by algorithm development and internal validation (n = 317, 66.9%). External validation was reported in 111 studies (23.4%), while clinical deployment was reported in 12 (2.5%). Translation beyond the development stage was particularly scarce in lower-income settings. Conclusions AI research in LMIC surgical care is expanding but unevenly distributed, with activity concentrated in higher-middle income Asian countries and striking gaps in low-income regions. Most work remains early stage, with little evidence of clinical use. Without investment in diverse data, infrastructure, and health system capacity, AI risks reinforcing global inequities rather than reducing them.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Valli et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c2b8de0f0f753b39d202https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znag018.330
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Artificial intelligence in surgical care for low- and middle-income countries: Challenges, opportunities, and the path forward2025 · 11 citations
  2. 2Artificial intelligence‐driven surgical innovation: A catalyst for medical equity2024
  3. 3Deploying medical AI in low-resource settings: a scoping review of challenges and strategies2026 · 4 citations
  4. 4Learning new surgical techniques in low and middle income countries, approval processes, and the impact of artificial intelligence2025 · 8 citations
  5. 5Artificial intelligence in prehospital emergency care systems in low- and middle-income countries: cure or curiosity? Insights from a qualitative study2025 · 3 citations