PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 2026Anticancer Research0 citations

Prognostic Impact of Lymph Node Ratio in Patients With Gastric Cancer Undergoing Curative Gastrectomy Post Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

KKKEISUKE KOMORINANorihiro AkimotoYNYUTA NAKAYAMA

Key Points

  • To assess the prognostic value of lymph node ratio (LNR) compared to ypN classification after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer patients.
  • Retrospective analysis of 201 gastric adenocarcinoma patients
  • Evaluated patient outcomes following curative gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • Classified patients based on LNR cutoffs: low, intermediate, and high
  • Used Cox proportional hazards models to compare LNR and ypN classifications
  • Higher LNR correlates with worse recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) with p<0.001
  • LNR remained an independent adverse prognostic factor for RFS and OS in multivariate analysis
  • Hazard ratios for intermediate and high LNR compared to low were significant, indicating increased risk of poor outcomes.

Abstract

Background/Aim: The lymph node ratio (LNR), defined as the ratio of metastatic to examined lymph nodes, is a prognostic indicator in gastric cancer after curative gastrectomy. However, in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), the absolute number of metastatic lymph nodes may decrease. Moreover, the N-stage classification after this (ypN) alone may not fully reflect residual nodal disease. We evaluated whether LNR-based stratification offers improved prognostic discrimination compared with ypN classification, using survival analysis together with time-dependent receiver operating characteristics analysis. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 201 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent post-NAC curative (R0) gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy at Kanagawa Cancer Center (March 1992 to November 2019). Patients were classified using commonly reported LNR cutoffs: low (0.25). Recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. The prognostic performance of the LNR and the ypN classification was compared using multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. Results: The median follow-up period was 37.6 months. Higher LNR was associated with worse RFS and OS (pvs. low LNR: intermediate: 3.622 (1.302-10.08), p=0.017; high: 3.923 (1.154-13.34), p=0.029] and OS vs. low LNR: intermediate: 3.590 (1.341-9.606), p=0.011; high: 4.057 (1.230-13.38), p=0.021 in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: The LNR may serve as a practical postoperative risk stratification metric for recurrence and survival after NAC in patients with gastric cancer, complementing the limitations of the ypN classification.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

KOMORI et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c2e4de0f0f753b39d691https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.18111
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper