PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 2026Age and Ageing0 citationsOpen Access

Comparing the impact of active floor-rise training with video demonstration on fear of falling and independent floor-rise ability in older adults living in the community: a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial

View Full Paper
SSShane SeeleyDSDawn A SkeltonCTChee-Wee Tan

Key Points

  • Investigate the effectiveness of floor-rise training in reducing fear of falling and improving floor-rise ability in older adults living in the community.
  • Conducted a multi-centre, cluster-randomised controlled before-after trial
  • Included 61 community-dwelling older adults aged 65+
  • Intervention involved 5 weekly 20-minute floor-rise training sessions using backward-chaining
  • Control group viewed a demonstration video with no practical exercise
  • Primary outcomes assessed include the Falls Efficacy Scale-International and timed floor-rise ability.
  • No significant differences in fear of falling and activity avoidance between groups
  • FRT participants showed significant reductions in floor-rise times across all measured positions
  • Post-intervention, 100% of FRT participants could rise from supine compared to 63% of controls
  • PAMF scores increased significantly in the FRT group, indicating better perceived risk management.

Abstract

Abstract Background Many older adults cannot rise from the floor independently after a fall, increasing risks of long-lies and reliance on emergency services. Objective Investigate whether floor-rise training (FRT) reduces fear of falling (FoF) and improves floor-rise ability in older adults. Design Multi-centre, cluster-randomised controlled before-after pilot trial. Setting Five community-based Otago exercise classes run by a third-sector organisation. Participants Sixty-one community-dwelling older adults (aged ≥65 years) attending weekly Otago classes were randomised (FRT n = 27, control n = 34). Forty-nine completed to follow-up and were analysed (FRT n = 22, control n = 27). No adverse events occurred. Methods Classes were cluster-randomised (3:2 allocation). Intervention: 5 weekly 20-minute FRT sessions utilising backward-chaining. Controls viewed a FRT demonstration video followed by discussion (20-minutes total), without physical practise. Primary outcome: Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I). Secondary outcomes: timed floor-rise and independent floor-rise ability (from supine, side-sitting, half-kneeling), Perceived Ability to Manage Risk of a Falls or Actual Falls (PAMF), FoF and activity avoidance, measured via visual analogue scales (1-item-question). Results Primary outcome (FES-I), FoF and activity avoidance showed no significant differences. However, FRT participants significantly reduced floor-rise times compared to controls: supine (13.1 s to 7.1 s, P = .001), side-sitting (8.0 s to 4.6 s, P = .046), and half-kneeling (3.9 s to 1.5 s, P .001). Post-intervention, 100% of FRT participants could rise from supine versus 63% of controls (P = .007). PAMF scores increased significantly in the FRT group (13.6 to 16.3, P = .033). Conclusion Although FoF did not change, a brief FRT intervention significantly improved floor-rise ability and PAMF. Integrating FRT into fall prevention programmes may reduce long-lie consequences.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Seeley et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c8c30dde0f0f753b39da45https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afag064
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper